Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20161752›Full record

ArticlePloS one2010

Telomere shortening sensitizes cancer cells to selected cytotoxic agents: in vitro and in vivo studies and putative mechanisms.

Orit Uziel, Einat Beery, Vladimir Dronichev, Katty Samocha, Sergei Gryaznov, Lola Weiss, Shimon Slavin, Michal Kushnir, Yardena Nordenberg, Claudette Rabinowitz and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Telomerase as a useful target in cancer fighting-the breast cancer case.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2013
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Telomere shortening and Alzheimer's disease.Neuromolecular medicine · 2013
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Orit UzielBeilinson Hospital, Rabin Medical Center, Felsenstein Medical Research Center, Petah-Tikva, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel.
Einat Beery
Vladimir Dronichev
Katty Samocha
Sergei Gryaznov
Lola Weiss
Shimon Slavin
Michal Kushnir
Yardena Nordenberg
Claudette Rabinowitz
Baruch Rinkevich
Tania Zehavi
Meir Lahav
Tel Aviv University · ILHadassah Academic College · ILIsrael Oceanographic and Limnological Research · ILRabin Medical Center · ILGeron (United States) · USMeir Medical Center · ILRosetta Genomics (Israel) · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTelomere/telomerase system has been recently recognized as an attractive target for anticancer therapy. Telomerase inhibition results in tumor regression and increased sensitivity to various cytotoxic drugs. However, it has not been fully established yet whether the mediator of these effects is telomerase inhibition per se or telomere shortening resulting from inhibition of telomerase activity. In addition, the characteristics and mechanisms of sensitization to cytotoxic drugs caused by telomerase inhibition has not been elucidated in a systematic manner. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsIn this study we characterized the relative importance of telomerase inhibition versus telomere shortening in cancer cells. Sensitization of cancer cells to cytotoxic drugs was achieved by telomere shortening in a length dependent manner and not by telomerase inhibition per se. In our system this sensitization was related to the mechanism of action of the cytotoxic drug. In addition, telomere shortening affected also other cancer cell functions such as migration. Telomere shortening induced DNA damage whose repair was impaired after administration of cisplatinum while doxorubicin or vincristine did not affect the DNA repair. These findings were verified also in in vivo mouse model. The putative explanation underlying the phenotype induced by telomere shortening may be related to changes in expression of various microRNAs triggered by telomere shortening. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: To our best knowledge this is the first study characterizing the relative impact of telomerase inhibition and telomere shortening on several aspects of cancer cell phenotype, especially related to sensitivity to cytotoxic drugs and its putative mechanisms. The microRNA changes in cancer cells upon telomere shortening are novel information. These findings may facilitate the development of telomere based approaches in treatment of cancer.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsApoptosisCell Line, TumorCell MovementCell SurvivalCisplatinComet AssayDNA DamageDNA RepairDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleHumansK562 CellsMaleMiceAntineoplastic AgentsCisplatinGRN163OligonucleotidesTelomerase

Identifiers

PMID20161752
PMCPMC2817744
OpenAlexW2057342950

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.