Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20161730›Full record

ArticlePloS one2010

Engineering clostridium strain to accept unmethylated DNA.

Hongjun Dong, Yanping Zhang, Zongjie Dai, Yin Li

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 92 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Identification of the lipodepsipeptide selethramide encoded in a giant nonribosomal peptide synthetase from aProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Tuning of Gene Expression inACS synthetic biology · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hongjun DongInstitute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Yanping Zhang
Zongjie Dai
Yin Li
Chinese Academy of Sciences · CNInstitute of Microbiology · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is difficult to genetically manipulate the medically and biotechnologically important genus Clostridium due to the existence of the restriction and modification (RM) systems. We identified and engineered the RM system of a model clostridial species, C. acetobutylicum, with the aim to allow the host to accept the unmethylated DNA efficiently. A gene CAC1502 putatively encoding the type II restriction endonuclease Cac824I was identified from the genome of C. acetobutylicum DSM1731, and disrupted using the ClosTron system based on group II intron insertion. The resulting strain SMB009 lost the type II restriction endonuclease activity, and can be transformed with unmethylated DNA as efficiently as with methylated DNA. The strategy reported here makes it easy to genetically modify the clostridial species using unmethylated DNA, which will help to advance the understanding of the clostridial physiology from the molecular level.

Indexed as

Bacterial ProteinsClostridiumClostridium acetobutylicumDeoxyribonucleases, Type II Site-SpecificDNADNA MethylationDNA Restriction-Modification EnzymesGenetic EngineeringMutationPlasmidsTransformation, GeneticBacterial ProteinsDeoxyribonucleases, Type II Site-SpecificDNADNA Restriction-Modification Enzymes

Identifiers

PMID20161730
PMCPMC2817722
OpenAlexW2031351113

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.