ArticleMathematics and computers in simulation2009
Multi-scale, multi-resolution brain cancer modeling.
Article in Mathematics and computers in simulation, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Review of the Application of Spatial Transcriptomics in Neuroscience.Interdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences · 2024Review
- Data-driven spatio-temporal modelling of glioblastoma.Royal Society open science · 2023Review
- Mathematical models of tumor cell proliferation: A review of the literature.Expert review of anticancer therapy · 2018Review
- Article
- Integrating Multiscale Modeling with Drug Effects for Cancer Treatment.Cancer informatics · 2015Review
- Multi-scale agent-based modeling on melanoma and its related angiogenesis analysis.Theoretical biology & medical modelling · 2013Article
- Multi-scale agent-based brain cancer modeling and prediction of TKI treatment response: incorporating EGFR signaling pathway and angiogenesis.BMC bioinformatics · 2012Article
- Developing a multiscale, multi-resolution agent-based brain tumor model by graphics processing units.Theoretical biology & medical modelling · 2011Article
- Hybrid models of tumor growth.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Systems biology and medicineReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In advancing discrete-based computational cancer models towards clinical applications, one faces the dilemma of how to deal with an ever growing amount of biomedical data that ought to be incorporated eventually in one form or another. Model scalability becomes of paramount interest. In an effort to start addressing this critical issue, here, we present a novel multi-scale and multi-resolution agent-based in silico glioma model. While 'multi-scale' refers to employing an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-driven molecular network to process cellular phenotypic decisions within the micro-macroscopic environment, 'multi-resolution' is achieved through algorithms that classify cells to either active or inactive spatial clusters, which determine the resolution they are simulated at. The aim is to assign computational resources where and when they matter most for maintaining or improving the predictive power of the algorithm, onto specific tumor areas and at particular times. Using a previously described 2D brain tumor model, we have developed four different computational methods for achieving the multi-resolution scheme, three of which are designed to dynamically train on the high-resolution simulation that serves as control. To quantify the algorithms' performance, we rank them by weighing the distinct computational time savings of the simulation runs versus the methods' ability to accurately reproduce the high-resolution results of the control. Finally, to demonstrate the flexibility of the underlying concept, we show the added value of combining the two highest-ranked methods. The main finding of this work is that by pursuing a multi-resolution approach, one can reduce the computation time of a discrete-based model substantially while still maintaining a comparably high predictive power. This hints at even more computational savings in the more realistic 3D setting over time, and thus appears to outline a possible path to achieve scalability for the all-important clinical translation.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.