Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20161214›Full record

ArticleFuture neurology2009

Developmental hearing loss disrupts synaptic inhibition: implications for auditory processing.

Anne E Takesian, Vibhakar C Kotak, Dan H Sanes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Future neurology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Hearing and early life adversity: effects of developmental stress on sensory processing.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Impact of Prematurity on Auditory Processing in Children.Pathophysiology : the official journal of the International Society for Pathophysiology · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Auditory Deprivation during Development Alters Efferent Neural Feedback and Perception.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. The role of GABAFrontiers in endocrinology · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Anne E TakesianCenter for Neural Science, New York, University, NY 10003, USA, Tel.: +1 212 998 3914, , aet241@nyu.edu.
Vibhakar C Kotak
Dan H Sanes

Funding

Hearing loss affects synaptic balance in auditory cortexR01DC006864 · NIDCD · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI SANES, DAN HARVEY · 2005 to 2009
$2.4M
The Effects of Developmental Hearing Loss on Inhibitory Short-term PlasticityF31DC008920 · NIDCD · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI TAKESIAN, ANNE E · 2007 to 2009
$85k
NIDCD NIH HHS F31 DC008920NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC006864
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hearing loss during development leads to central deficits that persist even after the restoration of peripheral function. One key class of deficits is due to changes in central inhibitory synapses, which play a fundamental role in all aspects of auditory processing. This review focuses on the anatomical and physiological alterations of inhibitory connections at several regions within the central auditory pathway following hearing loss. Such aberrant inhibitory synaptic function may be linked to deficits in encoding binaural and spectral cues. Understanding the cellular changes that occur at inhibitory synapses following hearing loss may provide specific loci that can be targeted to improve function.

Identifiers

PMID20161214
PMCPMC2716048

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.