Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20160722›Full record

Trial reportBritish journal of cancer2010

Bisphosphonates for osteoporosis treatment are associated with reduced breast cancer risk.

P A Newcomb, A Trentham-Dietz, J M Hampton

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in British journal of cancer, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
10.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 126 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Bisphosphonates for advanced prostate cancer.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Exposure to oral bisphosphonates and risk of gastrointestinal cancer.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Oral bisphosphonate use and lung cancer incidence among postmenopausal women.Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology · 2018
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

P A NewcombPaul P Carbone Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin, 610 Walnut Street, Madison, WI 53726, USA. pnewcomb@fhcrc.org
A Trentham-Dietz
J M Hampton
University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center · US

Funding

PHYSICAL ACTIVITY, LIFESTYLE AND OVARIAN CANCER RISKR01CA047147 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI NEWCOMB, POLLY A · 1988 to 2007
$2.6M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA047147NCI NIH HHS R01 CA47147
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBisphosphanates are used primarily for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis, and are also indicated for osseous complications of malignancy. In addition to their bone resorption properties, the most commonly used nitrogen-containing bisphosphonate compounds also inhibit protein prenylation, and thus may exert anti-tumour properties.

methodsTo evaluate whether the use of these drugs may be associated with cancer, specifically breast cancer, we conducted a population-based case-control study in Wisconsin from 2003 to 2006. Participants included 2936 incident invasive breast cancer cases and 2975 population controls aged < 70 years. Bisphosphonate use and potential confounders were assessed by interview.

resultsUsing multivariable logistic regression, the odds ratio for breast cancer in current bisphosphonate users compared with non-users was 0.67 (95% confidence interval 0.51-0.89). Increasing duration of use was associated with a greater reduction in risk (P-trend=0.01). Risk reduction was observed in women who were not obese (P-interaction=0.005).

conclusionThese results are suggestive of an additional benefit of the common use of bisphosphonates, in this instance, the reduction in breast cancer risk.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBone Density Conservation AgentsBreast NeoplasmsCase-Control StudiesDiphosphonatesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm InvasivenessOsteoporosis, PostmenopausalPrognosisRisk FactorsTreatment OutcomeWisconsinYoung AdultBone Density Conservation AgentsDiphosphonates

Identifiers

PMID20160722
PMCPMC2833248
OpenAlexW2080918625

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.