Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20160480›Full record

ArticleFly

New research resources at the Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center.

Kevin R Cook, Annette L Parks, Luke M Jacobus, Thomas C Kaufman, Kathleen A Matthews

Abstract readNews
In one paragraph

Article in Fly. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Fly · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Loss of calcium-binding proteinbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  4. microPublication biology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. A Cytological F1 RNAi Screen for Defects inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Insights fromFrontiers in neuroscience · 2023
    Review
  13. International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  14. International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  15. Emerging mechanisms of cell competition.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2020
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. FlyBase 2.0: the next generation.Nucleic acids research · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kevin R CookBloomington Drosophila Stock Center, Department of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA. kercook@indiana.edu
Annette L Parks
Luke M Jacobus
Thomas C Kaufman
Kathleen A Matthews

Funding

Resource Component: Acquisition, maintenance and distribution of Drosophila stocksP40OD018537 · OD · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI Annette L. Parks · 2014 to 2026
$13.5M
GENOMIC DELETION AND DUPLICATION COVERAGE IN DROSOPHILAR24RR014106 · NCRR · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI COOK, KEVIN R · 1999 to 2010
$2.3M
NCRR NIH HHS R24 RR014106
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center (BDSC) is a primary source of Drosophila stocks for researchers all over the world. It houses over 27,000 unique fly lines and distributed over 160,000 samples of these stocks this past year. This report provides a brief overview of significant recent events at the BDSC with a focus on new stock sets acquired in the past year, including stocks for phiC31 transformation, RNAi knockdown of gene expression, and SNP and quantitative trait loci discovery. We also describe additions to sets of insertions and molecularly defined chromosomal deficiencies, the creation of a new Deficiency Kit, and planned additions of X chromosome duplication sets.

Indexed as

DrosophilaModels, AnimalAnimalsIndianaRNA InterferenceSequence DeletionTransformation, GeneticX Chromosome

Identifiers

PMID20160480
PMCPMC2997732

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.