Trial reportEuropean addiction research2010
Clinical characteristics of central European and North American samples of pregnant women screened for opioid agonist treatment.
Trial report in European addiction research, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Peripartum pain management in opioid dependent women.European journal of pain (London, England) · 2012Trial
- Influence of site differences between urban and rural American and Central European opioid-dependent pregnant women and neonatal outcome characteristics.European addiction research · 2012Trial
- Are male neonates more vulnerable to neonatal abstinence syndrome than female neonates?Gender medicine · 2011Trial
- Impact of treatment approach on maternal and neonatal outcome in pregnant opioid-maintained women.Human psychopharmacology · 2011Trial
- Randomized controlled trials in pregnancy: scientific and ethical aspects. Exposure to different opioid medications during pregnancy in an intra-individual comparison.Addiction (Abingdon, England) · 2011Trial
- Neonatal abstinence syndrome after methadone or buprenorphine exposure.The New England journal of medicine · 2010Trial
- Rural, Pregnant, and Opioid Dependent: A Systematic Review.Substance abuse : research and treatment · 2016Review
- Increasing pregnancy-related use of prescribed opioid analgesics.Annals of epidemiology · 2013Article
- The treatment of alcohol and opioid dependence in pregnant women.Current opinion in psychiatry · 2012Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLittle comparable information is available regarding clinical characteristics of opioid-dependent women from different countries. In the present study, women from the USA, Canada and a Central European country, Austria, screened for participation in the Maternal Opioid Treatment Human Experimental Research study, were compared with respect to their demographic and addiction histories.
methodsPregnant women (n = 1,074) were screened for study participation using uniformed clinical criteria and instruments. The screening results were compared with regard to exclusion, demographics, drug use, and psychosocial and treatment histories.
resultsCompared to the screened US and Canadian women, Austrian women were more likely to be younger (p < 0.001), white (p < 0.001), had significantly lower levels of educational attainment (p < 0.001), were less likely to use opioids daily (p < 0.001) and more likely to have been prescribed buprenorphine (p < 0.001). Compared to both rural and urban US groups, the Austrian group was less likely to have legal issues (p < 0.001) and was younger when first prescribed agonist medication (p < 0.001).
conclusionThe differences between North American and European groups may offer unique insights concerning treatment and pregnancy outcomes for opioid-dependent pregnant women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.