Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20160278›Full record

ArticleCancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology2010

Perceived cancer risk: why is it lower among nonwhites than whites?

Heather Orom, Marc T Kiviniemi, Willie Underwood, Levi Ross, Vickie L Shavers

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 99 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Assessing Fear of Thyroid Cancer in the General U.S. Population: A Cross-Sectional Study.Thyroid : official journal of the American Thyroid Association · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Specifying Future Behavior When Assessing Risk Perceptions: Implications for Measurement and Theory.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2019
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Cancer-Related Risk Perceptions and Beliefs in Texas: Findings from a 2018 Population-Level Survey.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2019
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Heather OromThe School of Public Health and Health Professions, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo, NY 14214, USA. horom@buffalo.edu
Marc T Kiviniemi
Willie Underwood
Levi Ross
Vickie L Shavers
National Cancer Institute · USRoswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center · USUniversity at Buffalo, State University of New York · US

Funding

Affect and Decision-Making for Cancer-Related BehaviorsK07CA106225 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN · PI KIVINIEMI, MARC T · 2006 to 2010
$534k
NCI NIH HHS K07 CA106225NCI NIH HHS K07CA106225
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe explored racial/ethnic differences in perceived cancer risk and determinants of these differences in a nationally representative sample of whites, blacks, Hispanics, and Asians.

methodsMultiple regression techniques, including mediational analyses, were used to identify determinants and quantify racial/ethnic differences in the perception of the risk of developing cancer among 5,581 adult respondents to the 2007 Health Information Trends Survey (HINTS).

resultsBlacks, Hispanics, and Asians reported lower perceived cancer risk than whites [Bs = -0.40, -0.34, and -0.69, respectively; (Ps < 0.001)]. Contributing factors included relatively lower likelihood of reporting a family history of cancer, lower likelihood of having smoked, and a less strong belief that everything causes cancer among nonwhites than among whites. Racial/ethnic differences in perceived risk were attenuated in older respondents because perceived cancer risk was negatively associated with age for whites but not for nonwhites.

conclusionsNonwhites had lower perceptions of cancer risk than whites. Some of the racial/ethnic variability in perceived risk may be due to racial and ethnic differences in awareness of one's family history of cancer and its relevance for cancer risk, experiences with behavioral risk factors, and salience of cancer risk information.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdultAgedAsianBlack or African AmericanCross-Cultural ComparisonFemaleHispanic or LatinoHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsPerceptionRiskWhite People

Identifiers

PMID20160278
PMCPMC2836595
OpenAlexW2106030860

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.