Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20160160›Full record

Trial reportCirculation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes2010

Evaluation of the American Heart Association cardiovascular disease prevention guideline for women.

Judith Hsia, Rebecca J Rodabough, Joann E Manson, Simin Liu, Matthew S Freiberg, William Graettinger, Milagros C Rosal, Barb Cochrane, Donald Lloyd-Jones, Jennifer G Robinson and 2 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00000611 (Women's Health Initiative), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00000611 phase3completednot on this map

Women's Health Initiative (WHI)

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)ConditionsBone Diseases, Breast Neoplasms, Cardiovascular Diseases, Colonic NeoplasmsArmshormone replacement therapy, estrogens, progestins, estrogen replacement therapy, diet, fat-restricted
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Guideline
  3. Guideline
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Predictors of cardiovascular risk in women.Women's health (London, England) · 2013
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Judith HsiaGeorge Washington University, Washington, DC, USA. judith.hsia@astrazeneca.com
Rebecca J Rodabough
Joann E Manson
Simin Liu
Matthew S Freiberg
William Graettinger
Milagros C Rosal
Barb Cochrane
Donald Lloyd-Jones
Jennifer G Robinson
Barbara V Howard
Women's Health Initiative Research Group
University of Washington · US

Funding

Women's Health Initiative Memory Study (WHIMS)N01WH44221 · WH · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · 2009 to 2010
$3.1M
VANGUARD CENTER FOR WOMEN'S HEALTH INITIATIVEN01WH032111 · WH · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI WATTS, NELSON · 1993 to 2001
$1.6M
CLIN CTR CLIN TRIAL/OBSERVATIONAL STUDY OF WHIN01WH042108 · WH · GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI HSIA, JUDITH · 1994 to 2000
$1.4M
WOMENS HEALTH INITIATIVE-N01WH22110N01WH022110 · WH · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI ROSS, PRENTICE · 1992 to 2006
$1.2M
VANGUARD CENTER FOR WOMEN'S HEALTH INITIATIVEN01WH032105 · WH · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI OBERMAN, ALBERT · 1993 to 2000
$1.2M
VANGUARD CENTER FOR WOMENS HEALTH INITIATIVEN01WH032100 · WH · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI BERESFORD, SHIRLEY AA · 1993 to 2001
$1.1M
VANGUARD CENTER FOR WOMEN'S HEALTH INITIATIVEN01WH032118 · WH · UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE HEALTH SCI CTR · PI JOHNSON, KAREN C · 1993 to 2000
$992k
VANGUARD CENTER FOR WOMEN'S HEALTH INITIATIVEN01WH032122 · WH · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI TREVISAN, MAURIZIO · 1993 to 2000
$927k
VANGUARD CENTER FOR WOMENS HEALTH INITIATIVEN01WH032108 · WH · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY · PI GREENLAND, PHILIP · 1993 to 2000
$919k
CLIN CTR CLIN TRIAL/OBSERVATIONAL STUDY OF WHIN01WH042129 · WH · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI LIMACHER, MARIAN C. · 1994 to 2000
$868k
Women's Health Initiative Field CenterN01WH24152 · WH · UNIV OF MED/DENT OF NJ-SCHOOL OF NURSING · PI LASSER, NORMAN · 2007 to 2009
$648k
Women's Health InitiativeN01WH32122 · WH · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI WACTAWSKI-WENDE, JEAN · 2008 to 2009
$609k
WHI NIH HHS N01 WH022110WHI NIH HHS N01 WH042108WHI NIH HHS N01WH24152WHI NIH HHS N01WH32100-2WHI NIH HHS N01WH32105-6WHI NIH HHS N01WH32108-9WHI NIH HHS N01WH32111-13WHI NIH HHS N01WH32115WHI NIH HHS N01WH32118-32119WHI NIH HHS N01WH32122WHI NIH HHS N01WH42107-26WHI NIH HHS N01WH42129-32WHI NIH HHS N01WH44221
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe 2007 update to the American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines for cardiovascular disease prevention in women recommend a simplified approach to risk stratification. We assigned Women's Health Initiative participants to risk categories as described in the guideline and evaluated clinical event rates within and between strata. METHODS AND

resultsThe Women's Health Initiative enrolled 161 808 women ages 50 to 79 years and followed them prospectively for 7.8 years (mean). Applying the 2007 AHA guideline categories, 11% of women were high risk, 72% at-risk, and 4% at optimal risk; 13% of women did not fall into any category, that is, lacked risk factors but did not adhere to a healthy lifestyle (moderate intensity exercise for 30 minute most days and <7% of calories from saturated fat). Among high risk, at-risk, and optimal risk women, rates of myocardial infarction/coronary death were 12.5%, 3.1%, and 1.1% per 10 years (P for trend <0.0001); the event rate was 1.3% among women who could not be categorized. We observed a graded relationship between risk category and cardiovascular event rates for white, black, Hispanic, and Asian women, although event rates differed among ethnic groups (P for interaction=0.002). The AHA guideline predicted coronary events with accuracy similar to current Framingham risk categories (area under receiver operating characteristic curve for Framingham risk, 0.665; for AHA risk, 0.664; P=0.94) but less well than proposed Framingham 10-year risk categories of <5%, 5% to 20%, and >20% (area under receiver operating characteristic curve for Framingham risk, 0.724; for AHA risk, 0.664; P<0.0001).

conclusionsRisk stratification as proposed in the 2007 AHA guideline is simple, accessible to patients and providers, and identifies cardiovascular risk with accuracy similar to that of the current Framingham algorithm. Clinical Trial Registration- clinicaltrials.gov. Identifier: NCT00000611.

Indexed as

American Heart AssociationPractice Guidelines as TopicWomen's HealthWomen's Health ServicesAgedAlgorithmsCardiovascular DiseasesChi-Square DistributionFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLife StyleLogistic ModelsMiddle AgedPrognosisProportional Hazards Models

Identifiers

PMID20160160
PMCPMC2841216
OpenAlexW2142586294

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.