Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20159147›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2010

Drag force as a tool to test the active mechanical response of PC12 neurites.

Roberto Bernal, Francisco Melo, Pramod A Pullarkat

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The role of mechanics in axonal stability and development.Seminars in cell & developmental biology · 2023
    Review
  2. Actin Stress Fibers Response and Adaptation under Stretch.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Non-invasive Neurite Mechanics in Differentiated PC12 Cells.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2018
    Article
  6. An Integrated Cytoskeletal Model of Neurite Outgrowth.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2018
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Traction force and tension fluctuations in growing axons.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2015
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Growth cones as soft and weak force generators.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2011
    Article
  11. Mechanical manipulation of neurons to control axonal development.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2011
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Roberto BernalDepartmento de Física and Center for Advanced Interdisciplinary Research in Materials, Universidad de Santiago de Chile, Santiago, Chile. roberto.bernal@usach.cl
Francisco Melo
Pramod A Pullarkat

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We investigate the mechanical response of PC12 neurites subjected to a drag force imposed by a laminar flow perpendicular to the neurite axis. The curvature of the catenary shape acquired by an initially straight neurite under the action of the drag force provides information on both elongation and tension of the neurite. This method allows us to measure the rest tension and viscoelastic parameters of PC12 neurites and active behavior of neurites. Measurement of oscillations in the strain rate of neurites at constant flow rate provides insight on the response of molecular motors and additional support for the presence of a negative strain-rate sensitivity region in the global mechanical response of PC12 neurites.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaBridged Bicyclo Compounds, HeterocyclicCell ShapeElasticityNeuritesNocodazolePC12 CellsRatsStress, MechanicalThiazolidinesTime FactorsViscosityBridged Bicyclo Compounds, Heterocycliclatrunculin ANocodazoleThiazolidines

Identifiers

PMID20159147
PMCPMC2820632

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.