Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20158950›Full record

ArticleComparative medicine2010

A challenge model for Shigella dysenteriae 1 in cynomolgus monkeys (Macaca fascicularis).

Steven T Shipley, Aruna Panda, Abdul Q Khan, Edwin H Kriel, Milton Maciel, Sofie Livio, James P Nataro, Myron M Levine, Marcelo B Sztein, Louis J DeTolla

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Comparative medicine, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Neutrophil kinetics ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  4. Epithelial Cell Infection Analyses with Shigella.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2024
    Article
  5. Toward aInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Plasmid-Mediated Quinolone Resistance inFrontiers in microbiology · 2018
    Article
  8. Social bufferingPeerJ · 2016
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Progress and pitfalls in Shigella vaccine research.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2013
    Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Steven T ShipleyDepartment of Pathology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA.
Aruna Panda
Abdul Q Khan
Edwin H Kriel
Milton Maciel
Sofie Livio
James P Nataro
Myron M Levine
Marcelo B Sztein
Louis J DeTolla
University of Maryland, Baltimore · US

Funding

Vaccine strategy for broad spectrum protection agains non-typhoidal salmonellU54AI057168 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI WHITE, JUDITH M. · 2003 to 2013
$91.5M
Wild-type S. typhi Infection in Humans: Integrated Immunoprotective MechanismsU19AI082655 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI WHITE, OWEN R · 2009 to 2018
$27.8M
Protective Immunity by Shigella vaccines in humansR01AI057927 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI SZTEIN, MARCELO B. · 2004 to 2008
$2.6M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI057927NIAID NIH HHS R01-AI057927NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI082655NIAID NIH HHS U54 AI057168NIAID NIH HHS U54-AI057168
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Shigella dysenteriae type 1 can cause devastating pandemics with high case fatality rates; a vaccine for Shigella is unavailable currently. Because of the risks associated with performing challenge studies with wild-type S. dysenteriae 1 in human clinical trials to advance vaccine development, an improved nonhuman primate model is needed urgently. In the present study, cynomolgus macaques (Macaca fascicularis) were challenged with various doses of S. dysenteriae 1 strain 1617 to establish a dose that would produce shigellosis. Further, different routes of delivery of S. dysenteriae 1 were compared to establish the most appropriate route for infection. Animals receiving 10(11) cfu S. dysenteriae 1 intragastrically consistently developed signs of shigellosis characterized by the onset of diarrhea and dysentery within 2 to 3 d. Administration of as many as 10(9) cfu S. dysenteriae 1 intraduodenally did not elicit signs characteristic of infection in macaques despite fecal shedding of bacteria for as long as 10 d. S. dysenteriae 1 administered intraduodenally at 10(9) cfu or intragastrically at 10(11) cfu elicited robust IgG and IgA antibody responses to LPS. We have developed a reliable challenge model of infection with wild-type S. dysenteriae 1 in cynomolgus macaques that reproducibly induces disease and elicits robust immune responses. We believe that this animal model may provide unique insights into the immunologic mechanisms of protection to S. dysenteriae 1 infection and in advancing development of a vaccine against shigellosis.

Indexed as

Models, AnimalAnimalsAutoantibodiesFecesImmunoglobulin AImmunoglobulin GMacaca fascicularisShigella dysenteriaeAutoantibodiesImmunoglobulin AImmunoglobulin G

Identifiers

PMID20158950
PMCPMC2826086
OpenAlexW1607094899

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.