ArticleBiology direct2010
'Genome order index' should not be used for defining compositional constraints in nucleotide sequences--a case study of the Z-curve.
Article in Biology direct, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Principal Component Analyses (PCA)-based findings in population genetic studies are highly biased and must be reevaluated.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- A rebuttal to the comments on the genome order index and the Z-curve.Biology direct · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe Z-curve is a three dimensional representation of DNA sequences proposed over a decade ago and has been extensively applied to sequence segmentation, horizontal gene transfer detection, and sequence analysis. Based on the Z-curve, a "genome order index," was proposed, which is defined as S = a2+ c2+t2+g2, where a, c, t, and g are the nucleotide frequencies of A, C, T, and G, respectively. This index was found to be smaller than 1/3 for almost all tested genomes, which was taken as support for the existence of a constraint on genome composition. A geometric explanation for this constraint has been suggested. Each genome was represented by a point P whose distance from the four faces of a regular tetrahedron was given by the frequencies a, c, t, and g. They claimed that an inscribed sphere of radius r = 1/ square root 3 contains almost all points corresponding to various genomes, implying that S <r2. The distribution of the points P obtained by S was studied using the Z-curve.
resultsIn this work, we studied the basic properties of the Z-curve using the "genome order index" as a case study. We show that (1) the calculation of the radius of the inscribed sphere of a regular tetrahedron is incorrect, (2) the S index is narrowly distributed, (3) based on the second parity rule, the S index can be derived directly from the Shannon entropy and is, therefore, redundant, and (4) the Z-curve suffers from over dimensionality, and the dimension stands for GC content alone suffices to represent any given genome.
conclusionThe "genome order index" S does not represent a constraint on nucleotide composition. Moreover, S can be easily computed from the Gini-Simpson index and be directly derived from entropy and is redundant. Overall, the Z-curve and S are over-complicated measures to GC content and Shannon H index, respectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.