ArticleBMC genomics2010
Computational approaches for detecting protein complexes from protein interaction networks: a survey.
Article in BMC genomics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 108 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
108 citing papers in PubMed.
- Temporal network analysis in systems biology: concepts, inference, and validation.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2026Review
- Statistical analysis of sequential motifs at biologically relevant protein-protein interfaces.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024Article
- Predicting protein complexes in protein interaction networks using Mapper and graph convolution networks.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024Article
- Comprehensive Overview of Bottom-Up Proteomics Using Mass Spectrometry.ACS measurement science au · 2024Review
- Proteome-wide assessment of human interactome as a source of capturing domain-motif and domain-domain interactions.Journal of cell communication and signaling · 2024Article
- Article
- How different viruses perturb host cellular machinery via short linear motifs.EXCLI journal · 2023Review
- Small protein complex prediction algorithm based on protein-protein interaction network segmentation.BMC bioinformatics · 2022Article
- PCfun: a hybrid computational framework for systematic characterization of protein complex function.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2022Article
- Interactome of Arabidopsis Thaliana.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Computational identification of protein complexes from network interactions: Present state, challenges, and the way forward.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022Review
- Both simulation and sequencing data reveal coinfections with multiple SARS-CoV-2 variants in the COVID-19 pandemic.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022Article
- An Ensemble Learning Framework for Detecting Protein Complexes From PPI Networks.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- Metabolic channeling: predictions, deductions, and evidence.Molecular cell · 2021Review
- Identifying Protein Complexes With Clear Module Structure Using Pairwise Constraints in Protein Interaction Networks.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Article
- Multiscale community detection in Cytoscape.PLoS computational biology · 2020Article
- Article
- Identification of protein complexes and functional modules in E. coli PPI networks.BMC microbiology · 2020Article
- DPCT: A Dynamic Method for Detecting Protein Complexes From TAP-Aware Weighted PPI Network.Frontiers in genetics · 2020Article
- A Computational Framework for Predicting Direct Contacts and Substructures within Protein Complexes.Biomolecules · 2019Article
48 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMost proteins form macromolecular complexes to perform their biological functions. However, experimentally determined protein complex data, especially of those involving more than two protein partners, are relatively limited in the current state-of-the-art high-throughput experimental techniques. Nevertheless, many techniques (such as yeast-two-hybrid) have enabled systematic screening of pairwise protein-protein interactions en masse. Thus computational approaches for detecting protein complexes from protein interaction data are useful complements to the limited experimental methods. They can be used together with the experimental methods for mapping the interactions of proteins to understand how different proteins are organized into higher-level substructures to perform various cellular functions.
resultsGiven the abundance of pairwise protein interaction data from high-throughput genome-wide experimental screenings, a protein interaction network can be constructed from protein interaction data by considering individual proteins as the nodes, and the existence of a physical interaction between a pair of proteins as a link. This binary protein interaction graph can then be used for detecting protein complexes using graph clustering techniques. In this paper, we review and evaluate the state-of-the-art techniques for computational detection of protein complexes, and discuss some promising research directions in this field.
conclusionsExperimental results with yeast protein interaction data show that the interaction subgraphs discovered by various computational methods matched well with actual protein complexes. In addition, the computational approaches have also improved in performance over the years. Further improvements could be achieved if the quality of the underlying protein interaction data can be considered adequately to minimize the undesirable effects from the irrelevant and noisy sources, and the various biological evidences can be better incorporated into the detection process to maximize the exploitation of the increasing wealth of biological knowledge available.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.