Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20158681›Full record

ReviewTransfusion2010

Convalescent transfusion for pandemic influenza: preparing blood banks for a new plasma product?

Jonathon P Leider, Patricia A R Brunker, Paul M Ness

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Transfusion, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04468009 (Treatment of Critically Ill Patients With Covid-19 With Convalescent Plasma), which is not on this map. Cited by 30 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04468009 phase2completednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Treatment of Critically Ill Patients With Covid-19 With Convalescent Plasma

TypeinterventionalSponsorHospital de Infecciosas Francisco Javier MunizRan2020 to 2021Enrolled134ConditionsSARS-Associated Coronavirus, Covid19, SARS-CoV InfectionArmsConvalescent plasma
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A potentially effective treatment for COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis of convalescent plasma therapy in treating severe infectious disease.International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Preparedness and activities of the anti-SARS-CoV-2 convalescent plasma bank in the Veneto region (Italy): An organizational model for future emergencies.Transfusion and apheresis science : official journal of the World Apheresis Association : official journal of the European Society for Haemapheresis · 2021
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Convalescent plasma as a treatment modality for coronavirus disease 2019 in Sudan.Transfusion and apheresis science : official journal of the World Apheresis Association : official journal of the European Society for Haemapheresis · 2020
    Article
  16. Clinical management and mortality among COVID-19 cases in sub-Saharan Africa: A retrospective study from Burkina Faso and simulated case analysis.International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jonathon P LeiderJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. jleider@jhsph.edu
Patricia A R Brunker
Paul M Ness
Johns Hopkins University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Due to the potential of a severe pandemic to limit efficacy or availability of medical countermeasures, some researchers have begun a search for new interventions that could complement the planned antiviral- and vaccine-based response to an influenza pandemic. One such countermeasure-the transfusion of pandemic influenza-specific antibodies from surviving patients to the clinically ill-is the focus of this commentary. Passive immunotherapy, which includes the use of monoclonal antibodies (MoAbs), hyperimmune globulin, or convalescent plasma, had been used before the advent of antibiotics and has recently reentered the limelight due to the accelerating development of MoAb therapies against cancer, a number of microbes, allograft rejection, and a host of other conditions. After the plausible biologic mechanism and somewhat limited data supporting the efficacy for this modality against influenza are reviewed, safety and logistical concerns for utilization of this potential new product (fresh convalescent plasma against influenza [FCP-Flu]) are discussed. FCP-Flu could indeed prove useful in a response to a pandemic, but two necessary items must first be satisfied. Most importantly, more research should be conducted to establish FCP-Flu efficacy against the current and other pandemic strains. Second, and also importantly, blood banks and donor centers should examine whether offering this new product would be feasible in a pandemic and begin planning before a more severe pandemic forces us to respond without adequate preparation.

Indexed as

Blood BanksBlood Component TransfusionDisease OutbreaksPlasmaAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, ViralHumansInfluenza, HumanAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Viral

Identifiers

PMID20158681
PMCPMC7201862
OpenAlexW1485932749

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.