Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20158608›Full record

ArticleLetters in applied microbiology2010

Triclosan inhibition of mycobacterial InhA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: yeast mitochondria as a novel platform for in vivo antimycolate assays.

A Gurvitz

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Letters in applied microbiology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 90% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

A GurvitzSection of Physiology of Lipid Metabolism, Institute of Physiology, Center for Physiology, Pathophysiology and Immunology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. aner.gurvitz@meduniwien.ac.at
Medical University of Vienna · AT

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF P 20764
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo demonstrate the suitability of yeast to act as a novel biotechnological platform for conducting in vivo inhibition assays using drugs with low efficacies towards their mycobacterial targets, such as occurs in the situation with triclosan and InhA. METHODS AND

resultsA surrogate yeast host represented by Saccharomyces cerevisiae etr1Delta cells lacking Etr1p, the 2-trans-enoyl-thioester reductase of mitochondrial type 2 fatty acid synthase (FASII), was designed to rely on the Mycobacterium tuberculosis FASII enzyme InhA. Although InhA is 10,000 times less sensitive to the antimicrobial drug triclosan than is bacterial FabI, the respiratory growth of yeast cells depending on InhA was severely affected on glycerol medium containing triclosan.

conclusionsThe yeast system could detect enzyme inhibition despite the use of a drug with only low efficacy. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: Tuberculosis affects a third of the human population, and InhA is a major drug target for combating this disease. InhA is inhibited by isoniazid, but triclosan-derived compounds are presently being developed as antimycolates. A demonstration of triclosan inhibition of InhA in yeast represents a meaningful variation in studying this effect in mycobacteria, because it occurred without the potentially confusing aspects of perturbing protein-protein interactions which are presumed vital to mycobacterial FASII, inactivating other important enzymes or eliciting a dedicated transcriptional response in Myco. tuberculosis.

Indexed as

Bacterial ProteinsMitochondriaMycobacterium tuberculosisOxidoreductasesSaccharomyces cerevisiaeTriclosanBacterial ProteinsInhA protein, MycobacteriumOxidoreductasesTriclosan

Identifiers

PMID20158608
PMCPMC2958301
OpenAlexW2068705350

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.