Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20158294›Full record

ArticleExperimental and clinical psychopharmacology2010

Nicotine primes attention to competing affective stimuli in the context of salient alternatives.

Gregory L Asgaard, David G Gilbert, Debra Malpass, Chihiro Sugai, Amber Dillon

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. A review of the effects of nicotine on social functioning.Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology · 2018
    Review
  8. The Sociopharmacology of Tobacco Addiction: Implications for Understanding Health Disparities.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2016
    Review
  9. Effects of nicotine and nicotine expectancy on attentional bias for emotional stimuli.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Gregory L AsgaardSouthern Illinois University at Carbondale, IL, USA. greg.asgaard@gmail.com
David G Gilbert
Debra Malpass
Chihiro Sugai
Amber Dillon

Funding

Attentional Bias &Affect in Stress-Vulnerable SmokersR01DA017837 · NIDA · SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY CARBONDALE · PI GILBERT, DAVID G · 2004 to 2007
$1.4M
Nicotine: Cognition-Affect InteractionsR01DA014104 · NIDA · SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY CARBONDALE · PI GILBERT, DAVID G · 2003 to 2005
$809k
NIDA NIH HHS DA014104NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA014104NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA017837
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the importance of the subject, the effects of nicotine on the interplay between affect and attentional bias are not clear. This interplay was assessed with a novel design of the Primed Attentional Competition Task (PACT). It included a 200-ms duration emotional priming picture (negative, positive, or neutral) followed by a dual-target picture of two emotional faces side-by-side. A second task included an emotional priming picture followed by a single emotional target picture in a classic affective priming (CAP) task, assessing reaction time to identify the valence. Smokers completed the tasks in a double-blind repeated measures design wearing a nicotine patch on one day and a placebo patch on the other day. Consistent with hypotheses, nicotine enhanced the effectiveness of positive primes to bias first gaze-fixations (FGFs) toward neutral pictures relative to negative pictures and attenuated the effectiveness of negative primes on FGFs toward negative pictures, but did not bias performance in the CAP task where competing target stimuli were not present. These effects of nicotine on affective priming and attentional bias toward competing reinforcers may contribute to smoking motivation.

Indexed as

AdultAttentionDouble-Blind MethodEmotionsFemaleHumansMaleNicotinePhotic StimulationReaction TimeSmokingYoung AdultNicotine

Identifiers

PMID20158294
PMCPMC2846408

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.