ArticleDrug safety2010
'First, do no harm': factors that influence pharmacists making decisions about over-the-counter medication: a qualitative study in Northern Ireland.
Article in Drug safety, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Enhancing Evidence-Based Pharmacy by Comparing the Quality of Web-Based Information Sources to the EVInews Database: Randomized Controlled Trial With German Community Pharmacists.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023Trial
- An online cross-sectional survey of community pharmacists to assess information needs for evidence-based self-medication counselling.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2023Article
- Barriers and facilitators for providing self-care advice in community pharmacies: a qualitative study.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2023Article
- Determination of Factors Influencing Pharmacists While Recommending Immune-Enhancing ProductsTurkish journal of pharmaceutical sciences · 2022Article
- Learning From Consultations Conducted by Community Pharmacists in Northern Ireland for Nonprescription Sildenafil: A Qualitative Study Using the Theoretical Domains Framework.Sexual medicine · 2021Article
- Future Pharmacists' Opinions on the Facilitation of Self-Care with Over-the-Counter Products and Whether This Should Remain a Core Role.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Strategic Analysis of the Turkish Over-the-Counter Drugs and Non-pharmaceutical Products MarketTurkish journal of pharmaceutical sciences · 2021Article
- Factors impeding the supply of over-the-counter medications according to evidence-based practice: A mixed-methods study.PloS one · 2020Article
- Development of a Theory-Based Intervention to Enhance Information Exchange during Over-The-Counter Consultations in Community Pharmacy.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018Article
- Community pharmacists' knowledge, practices and beliefs about complementary and alternative medicine in Palestine: a cross-sectional study.BMC complementary and alternative medicine · 2017Article
- Development of a decision support system for the practice of responsible self-medication.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2016Article
- Is there potential for the future provision of triage services in community pharmacy?Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice · 2016Review
- Pharmacists in pharmacovigilance: can increased diagnostic opportunity in community settings translate to better vigilance?Drug safety · 2014Review
- Pharmacists' attitudes towards an evidence-based approach for over-the-counter medication.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLittle is known about how community pharmacists make decisions about which over-the-counter (OTC) medication to supply to a patient and the role of clinical evidence in making those decisions.
objectiveTo explore factors that influence product selection by the pharmacist and the role of evidence-based practice in this decision.
methodsIn this qualitative study, community pharmacists registered in Northern Ireland and recruited via advertising and various qualitative sampling techniques, participated in face-to-face, semi-structured interviews (June 2007-September 2007) to discuss issues around OTC medication, including the use of evidence, how they judged a product to be effective, and their views on evidence-based medicine and its application to OTC medication. All interviews were digitally recorded, fully transcribed and analysed using the principles of constant comparison.
resultsTwenty-six pharmacists participated in interviews. Safety was the over-arching consideration for pharmacists when making decisions. The subordinate themes were product, patient and professional factors. In terms of the product subordinate theme, use or consideration of evidence was secondary in the selection of OTC medicines. Pharmacists considered the potential for harm in the first instance and if the product was deemed safe, although lacking any evidence for effectiveness, the product was supplied. In relation to patient factors, it emerged that pharmacists were influenced by patient demand for a particular OTC product and wanted to meet patient expectations, provided that the requested product was judged to be safe. Similarly, professional factors such as ethical considerations (primarily in relation to safety) and respecting patient choice also influenced decision making. However, pharmacists recognized the conflict between professional requirements to practise according to evidence-based principles and patient demands.
conclusionThis study suggests that pharmacists considered safety above all other factors when recommending OTC products to patients, and evidence of effectiveness was seldom considered when selling OTC medicines. If evidence-based practice is to influence this type of decision, pharmacists need to use the evidence that is available and be prepared to discuss evidence with patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
20158288What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.