Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20157558›Full record

ArticleAging2009

Circadian disruption induced by light-at-night accelerates aging and promotes tumorigenesis in rats.

Irina A Vinogradova, Vladimir N Anisimov, Andrey V Bukalev, Anna V Semenchenko, Mark A Zabezhinski

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Aging, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 101 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Rat Models of Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer.Journal of mammary gland biology and neoplasia · 2024
    Review
  10. Chaotic aging: intrinsically disordered proteins in aging-related processes.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2023
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Light Pollution and Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Aging and the clock: Perspective from flies to humans.The European journal of neuroscience · 2020
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Effects of light on aging and longevity.Ageing research reviews · 2019
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Irina A VinogradovaPetrozavodsk State University, pr. Lenina, 33, Petrozavodsk 185910, Russia.
Vladimir N Anisimov
Andrey V Bukalev
Anna V Semenchenko
Mark A Zabezhinski
Institute of Oncology NN Petrov · RUPetrozavodsk State University · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We evaluated the effect of various light/dark regimens on the survival, life span and tumorigenesis in rats. Two hundred eight male and 203 females LIO rats were subdivided into 4 groups and kept at various light/dark regimens: standard 12:12 light/dark (LD); natural lighting of the North-West of Russia (NL); constant light (LL), and constant darkness (DD) since the age of 25 days until natural death. We found that exposure to NL and LL regimens accelerated development of metabolic syndrome and spontaneous tumorigenesis, shortened life span both in male and females rats as compared to the standard LD regimen. We conclude that circadian disruption induced by light-at-night accelerates aging and promotes tumorigenesis in rats. This observation supports the conclusion of the International Agency Research on Cancer that shift-work that involves circadian disruption is probably carcinogenic to humans.

Indexed as

DarknessLightAgingAging, PrematureAnimalsBiomarkersBlood GlucoseCholesterolCircadian RhythmDisease Models, AnimalFemaleHomeostasisLongevityMaleMetabolic SyndromeModels, AnimalBiomarkersBlood GlucoseCholesterollife spanlight-at-nightratstumorigenesis

Identifiers

PMID20157558
PMCPMC2816394
OpenAlexW2135217576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.