ArticleAging2009
A structural basis for cellular senescence.
Article in Aging, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ionizing irradiation-induced Fgr in senescent cells mediates fibrosis.Cell death discovery · 2021Article
- Cellular senescence induces replication stress with almost no affect on DNA replication timing.Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.) · 2018Article
- The post-mitotic state in neurons correlates with a stable nuclear higher-order structure.Communicative & integrative biology · 2012Article
- The role of nuclear matrix proteins binding to matrix attachment regions (Mars) in prostate cancer cell differentiation.PloS one · 2012Article
- DNA moves sequentially towards the nuclear matrix during DNA replication in vivo.BMC cell biology · 2011Article
- Continued stabilization of the nuclear higher-order structure of post-mitotic neurons in vivo.PloS one · 2011Article
- Determination of the in vivo structural DNA loop organization in the genomic region of the rat albumin locus by means of a topological approach.DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Replicative senescence (RS) that limits the proliferating potential of normal eukaryotic cells occurs either by a cell-division counting mechanism linked to telomere erosion or prematurely through induction by cell stressors such as oncogene hyper-activation. However, there is evidence that RS also occurs by a stochastic process that is independent of number of cell divisions or cellular stress and yet it leads to a highly-stable, non-reversible post-mitotic state that may be long-lasting and that such a process is widely represented among higher eukaryotes. Here I present and discuss evidence that the interactions between DNA and the nuclear substructure, commonly known as the nuclear matrix, define a higher-order structure within the cell nucleus that following thermodynamic constraints, stochastically evolves towards maximum stability, thus becoming limiting for mitosis to occur. It is suggested that this process is responsible for ultimate replicative senescence and yet it is compatible with long-term cell survival.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.