Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20157338›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Microbiology2010

Host interactions of probiotic bacterial surface molecules: comparison with commensals and pathogens.

Sarah Lebeer, Jos Vanderleyden, Sigrid C J De Keersmaecker

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Microbiology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 454 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
454citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
92.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

454 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 1,006 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Nasal administration of a probiotic assemblage in allergic rhinitis: A randomised placebo-controlled crossover trial.Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2022
    Trial
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Paraprobiotics Derived FromFood science & nutrition · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. mLife · 2026
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Exploring the Adhesion Potential ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  20. Article

394 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sarah LebeerCentre of Microbial and Plant Genetics, K.U.Leuven, Kasteelpark Arenberg 20, bus 2460, B-3001 Leuven, Belgium.
Jos Vanderleyden
Sigrid C J De Keersmaecker
KU Leuven · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

How can probiotic bacteria transduce their health benefits to the host? Bacterial cell surface macromolecules are key factors in this beneficial microorganism-host crosstalk, as they can interact with host pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) of the gastrointestinal mucosa. In this Review, we highlight the documented signalling interactions of the surface molecules of probiotic bacteria (such as long surface appendages, polysaccharides and lipoteichoic acids) with PRRs. Research on host-probiotic interactions can benefit from well-documented host-microorganism studies that span the spectrum from pathogenicity to mutualism. Distinctions and parallels are therefore drawn with the interactions of similar molecules that are presented by gastrointestinal commensals and pathogens.

Indexed as

Host-Pathogen InteractionsAnimalsBacteriaGastrointestinal TractHumansProbioticsReceptors, Pattern RecognitionReceptors, Pattern Recognition

Identifiers

PMID20157338
OpenAlexW1974738011

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.