Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20157303›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Urology2010

Emerging gene and stem cell therapies for the treatment of erectile dysfunction.

Ahmed Harraz, Alan W Shindel, Tom F Lue

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Urology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Adipose-derived stem cells modified byNeural regeneration research · 2020
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Gene therapy as future treatment of erectile dysfunction.Expert opinion on biological therapy · 2010
    Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ahmed HarrazDepartment of Urology, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143-0738, USA.
Alan W Shindel
Tom F Lue
University of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

Prevention and Treatment of ImpotenceR37DK045370 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI LUE, TOM F · 2004 to 2013
$3.5M
NIDDK NIH HHS R37 DK045370
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Erectile dysfunction is a prevalent condition that leads to significant morbidity and distress, not just for affected men but also for their partners. Very few currently available treatments ameliorate the underlying causes of the disorder and 'cure' the disease state. Much recent effort has been focused on the development of gene and cell-based approaches to rectify the molecular and tissue defects responsible for ED. Gene therapy has been investigated in animal models as a means to restore normal function to the penis; at this time, however, only one human trial has been published in the peer-reviewed literature. Recent gene therapy studies have focused on the modulation of enzymes associated with the NOS/cGMP pathway, and supplementation of trophic factors, peptides and potassium channels. Stem cell therapy has been a topic of interest in more recent years but there are currently very few published reports in animal models and none in human men. Although stem cell therapy offers the potential for restoration of functional tissues, legitimate concerns remain regarding the long-term fate of stem cells. The long-term safety of both gene and stem cell therapy must be thoroughly investigated before large-scale human studies can be considered.

Indexed as

Erectile DysfunctionGenetic TherapyGenetic VectorsHumansMaleStem Cell TransplantationTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID20157303
PMCPMC3927494
OpenAlexW1980970274

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.