Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20156360›Full record

ArticleCritical care (London, England)2010

Risk factors for multidrug resistant bacteria and optimization of empirical antibiotic therapy in postoperative peritonitis.

Pascal Augustin, Nathalie Kermarrec, Claudette Muller-Serieys, Sigismond Lasocki, Denis Chosidow, Jean-Pierre Marmuse, Nadia Valin, Jean-Marie Desmonts, Philippe Montravers

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care (London, England), 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 107 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Optimized Treatment of Nosocomial Peritonitis.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2020
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Pascal AugustinDepartment of Anesthesiology and Surgical Intensive Care Unit, Hôpital Bichat-Claude Bernard, Université Paris VII Denis Diderot, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, 46 rue Henri Huchard, 75877 Paris Cedex 18, France. pascalaugustin@hotmail.com
Nathalie Kermarrec
Claudette Muller-Serieys
Sigismond Lasocki
Denis Chosidow
Jean-Pierre Marmuse
Nadia Valin
Jean-Marie Desmonts
Philippe Montravers
Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FRUniversité Paris Cité · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe main objective was to determine risk factors for presence of multidrug resistant bacteria (MDR) in postoperative peritonitis (PP) and optimal empirical antibiotic therapy (EA) among options proposed by Infectious Disease Society of America and the Surgical Infection Society guidelines.

methodsOne hundred patients hospitalised in the intensive care unit (ICU) for PP were reviewed. Clinical and microbiologic data, EA and its adequacy were analysed. The in vitro activities of 9 antibiotics in relation to the cultured bacteria were assessed to propose the most adequate EA among 17 regimens in the largest number of cases.

resultsA total of 269 bacteria was cultured in 100 patients including 41 episodes with MDR. According to logistic regression analysis, the use of broad-spectrum antibiotic between initial intervention and reoperation was the only significant risk factor for emergence of MDR bacteria (odds ratio (OR) = 5.1; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.7 - 15; P = 0.0031). Antibiotics providing the best activity rate were imipenem/cilastatin (68%) and piperacillin/tazobactam (53%). The best adequacy for EA was obtained by combinations of imipenem/cilastatin or piperacillin/tazobactam, amikacin and a glycopeptide, with values reaching 99% and 94%, respectively. Imipenem/cilastin was the only single-drug regimen providing an adequacy superior to 80% in the absence of broad spectrum antibiotic between initial surgery and reoperation.

conclusionsInterval antibiotic therapy is associated with the presence of MDR bacteria. Not all regimens proposed by Infectious Disease Society of America and the Surgical Infection Society guidelines for PP can provide an acceptable rate of adequacy. Monotherapy with imipenem/cilastin is suitable for EA only in absence of this risk factor for MDR. For other patients, only antibiotic combinations may achieve high adequacy rates.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, MicrobialDrug Resistance, MultipleAgedAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacteriaFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleMiddle AgedPeritonitisPostoperative ComplicationsRisk FactorsAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID20156360
PMCPMC2875535
OpenAlexW2101803843

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.