ArticleClinical drug investigation2010
Incorporating BCNU wafers into malignant glioma treatment: European case studies.
Article in Clinical drug investigation, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- A numerical study of the distribution of chemotherapeutic drug carmustine in brain glioblastoma.Drug delivery and translational research · 2022Article
- The treatment of glioblastoma multiforme through activation of microglia and TRAIL induced by rAAV2-mediated IL-12 in a syngeneic rat model.Journal of biomedical science · 2012Article
- Nano to micro delivery systems: targeting angiogenesis in brain tumors.Journal of angiogenesis research · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Carmustine (BCNU: N,N'-bis[2-chloroethyl]-N-nitrosourea) wafers are a local chemotherapeutic agent for the treatment of malignant glioma. They avoid the problems of high toxicity and short half-life associated with systemic delivery, and can bridge the traditional 'treatment gap' between surgery and subsequent conventional chemo- or radiotherapy. Clinical trials have demonstrated significant improvements in survival and quality of life for patients after complete tumour resection and BCNU wafer implantation. In practice, clinicians may use BCNU wafers in conjunction with other radio- and chemotherapies, in order to maximize the chance of a beneficial patient outcome. The purpose of these case reports is to exemplify how four experienced European clinicians employ BCNU wafers for the management of malignant glioma, and to illustrate how BCNU wafers can be effectively incorporated into treatment regimens. Four patients are described in whom BCNU wafers were implanted during the course of treatment for glioblastoma multiforme, the most severe and common type of malignant glioma. These include three patients with recurrent disease, and a single patient with a newly diagnosed tumour. All four patients received additional radio- and chemotherapy as appropriate. Treatment was well tolerated and patient survival from diagnosis ranged from 56 to 132 weeks. This compared favourably with the survival of approximately 58 weeks seen in the recent EORTC-NCIC clinical trial of combined radiotherapy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide. BCNU wafers are an effective means of increasing survival and quality of life in patients diagnosed with malignant glioma, and are a valuable addition to the overall multimodal treatment strategy for these tumours.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.