ArticleClinical drug investigation2010
Efficacy and safety of ezetimibe for Japanese patients with dyslipidaemia: The ESSENTIAL Study.
Article in Clinical drug investigation, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Emerging Therapies for the Treatment of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease: From Bench to Bedside.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Genetics of Triglyceride-Rich Lipoproteins Guide Identification of Pharmacotherapy for Cardiovascular Risk Reduction.Cardiovascular drugs and therapy · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThere are insufficient data available on the efficacy and safety of lipid-lowering therapy for patients with dyslipidaemia complicated by multiple metabolic abnormalities.
objectiveThis study aimed to examine the efficacy and safety of ezetimibe 10 mg/day administered to Japanese patients with dyslipidaemia.
methodsThis was a prospective study carried out at Kyushu University Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan. In one group, ezetimibe 10 mg/day alone was given to 33 patients for 12 weeks. In the other two groups, ezetimibe was given with an HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor (statin) to 13 patients for 12 weeks: pravastatin 10 mg/day (n = 7) or rosuvastatin 2.5 mg/day (n = 6). The main outcome measure was the effect of ezetimibe on low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and other lipid levels from baseline to 12 weeks.
resultsAfter 12 weeks of treatment, all groups showed marked reductions in mean +/- SD LDL-C level (from 155.4 +/- 22.0 mg/dL at baseline to 118.0 +/- 28.1 mg/dL, i.e. -37.4 mg/dL; p < 0.001). The mean reduction in LDL-C level with ezetimibe monotherapy was significantly greater in patients with impaired LDL-C metabolism, glucose metabolism or hypertension than in those without such abnormalities (-21.0% vs -8.4%, p < 0.01; -22.7% vs -9.5%, p < 0.05; and -22.5% vs -5.9%, p < 0.05; respectively). The reduction in LDL-C levels with ezetimibe monotherapy was also correlated with the number of metabolic abnormalities (rho = 0.426, p = 0.013).
conclusionsBoth ezetimibe monotherapy and combination therapy with ezetimibe and a statin were able to safely and effectively control LDL-C levels in Japanese patients with dyslipidaemia, including those with metabolic abnormalities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.