ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2010
Prognostic value of dobutamine stress echocardiography in diabetic patients.
Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative definitions for moderate-severe ischemia in stress nuclear, echocardiography, and magnetic resonance imaging.JACC. Cardiovascular imaging · 2014Review
- Long-term prognostic value of dobutamine stress echocardiography in diabetic patients with limited exercise capability: a 13-year follow-up study.Diabetes care · 2012Article
- Stress imaging in patients with diabetes; routine practice?The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2011Article
- Cardiovascular imaging 2010 in the International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2011Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
CAD is the main cause of morbidity and mortality in diabetic patients; we need reliable clinical parameters to stratify cardiovascular risk in these patients. We thus assessed prognostic value of clinical parameters, rest and stress echocardiographic data in diabetic patients, with known or suspected CAD. We studied 322 type 2 diabetic patients, who underwent dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) for known or suspected CAD; for prognostic assessment, end-points were all-cause mortality and hard cardiac events (cardiac death and non fatal myocardial infarction). During DSE, viability and inducible ischemia developed in 65 (20%) and 192 (60%) subjects, respectively; a severe ischemia (an asynergic area including more than 40% of all segments combined with a rate pressure product < 17,000) appeared in 88 (27%). Presence of a diabetic treatment or microvascular diabetic complications didn't influence prognosis, while a longer diabetes duration was associated with a higher all-cause mortality at univariate analysis. At multivariate analysis, an advanced age (RR = 1.108, CI: 1.039-1.182, P = 0.002), a lower left ventricular ejection fraction (RR = 0.956, CI: 0.919-0.994, P = 0.025) and, tendentially, peripheral vascular disease (RR = 2.942, CI: 0.985-8.785, P = 0.053) independently determined an increased all-cause mortality. New hard cardiac events occurred more frequently in presence of peripheral vascular disease (RR = 2.975, CI: 1.339-6.608, P = 0.007), viability (RR = 3.427, CI: 1.400-8.390, P = 0.007) and severe ischemia (RR = 3.245, CI: 1.503-7.005, P = 0.003). In diabetic patients with known or suspected CAD, presence of viability and severe ischemia during DSE are independently associated with higher occurrence of hard cardiac events.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.