Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20155425›Full record

ReviewLangenbeck's archives of surgery2010

Solid pseudopapillary neoplasm of the pancreas--proposed algorithms for diagnosis and surgical treatment.

László Romics, Attila Oláh, Tibor Belágyi, Nóra Hajdú, Péter Gyurus, Viktória Ruszinkó

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 83 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Clinical update on the management of pseudopapillary tumor of pancreas.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2018
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

László RomicsDepartment of Surgery, Victoria Infirmary, Glasgow, UK.
Attila Oláh
Tibor Belágyi
Nóra Hajdú
Péter Gyurus
Viktória Ruszinkó
Petz Aladár Megyei Oktató Kórház · HUGlasgow Victoria Infirmary · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe incidence of solid pseudopapillary neoplasm (SPN) of the pancreas is rising. Although the evidence for proper management is accumulating, we still lack diagnostic and therapeutic guidelines. In this paper, therefore, we propose an algorithm for diagnosis and treatment of this rare type of tumor.

methodsA literature search was carried out on "Medline" and "Pubmed" databases to identify studies investigating the clinicopathologic features, pathogenesis, diagnostic, and differential diagnostic pathways, and surgical and adjuvant treatment options. Evidence from relevant published literature was completed with data of six patients treated with SPN in our institution.

resultsThis study included case series and retrospective reviews only, since no higher level of evidence exists in the relevant literature. The articles emphasized that preoperative diagnosis is desirable to set up a precise plan for surgical treatment. Further, an R0 organ-sparing resection for primary SPN and an en bloc resection of locally advanced SPN are advised, while resection of synchronous as well as metachronous distant metastases is strongly advocated for this rare type of pancreatic cancer. The role of adjuvant chemo- or radiotherapy still needs to be defined. Finally, a diagnostic and therapeutic algorithm is devised in this paper to aid proper management of SPN.

conclusionCurrent recommendations for treatment of SPN of the pancreas rely mainly on case series as single institutional experiences and retrospective reviews. Although the level of evidence is relatively low, the way of management discussed above is likely to provide an excellent prognosis in typically young patients with SPN.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPancreasPancreatic NeoplasmsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID20155425
OpenAlexW2081044037

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.