Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20155408›Full record

ReviewCerebellum (London, England)2010

14-3-3 proteins and spinocerebellar ataxia type 1: from molecular interaction to human neuropathology.

Takahiko Umahara, Toshiki Uchihara

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Cerebellum (London, England), 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Takahiko UmaharaDepartment of Geriatric Medicine, Tokyo Medical University, Shinjuku-ku, Japan. takahiko@tokyo-med.ac.jp
Toshiki Uchihara
Fuchu Hospital · JPTokyo Medical University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This mini-review focuses on the possible relevance of 14-3-3 proteins in spinocerebellar ataxia type 1 (SCA1). 14-3-3 proteins are mainly localized in the synapses and neuronal cytoplasm, and seven isoforms have been identified in mammals. This family of proteins was initially identified as adaptor proteins which bind to phosphoserine-containing motifs. Binding motifs and potential functions of 14-3-3 proteins are now recognized to have a wide range of functional relevance. SCA1 is an autosomal-dominant neurodegenerative disorder and is linked to polyglutamine expansion (ataxin-1 protein). The Zoghbi and Orr group showed direct interaction of 14-3-3 proteins with ataxin-1 where nuclear recruitment of the ataxin-1 protein is dependent on its phosphorylation. This targeted binding of 14-3-3 protein to phosphorylated ataxin-1 to stabilize ataxin-1 in cellular models was corroborated by our double-labeling study for expanded polyglutamine and 14-3-3 proteins which demonstrated colocalization of these two epitopes in the neuronal nuclei in human autopsied brains with SCA1. Ataxin-1/14-3-3 protein interaction is a new potential target for therapeutic intervention in the treatment of SCA1.

Indexed as

14-3-3 ProteinsAnimalsAtaxin-1AtaxinsBrainHumansModels, NeurologicalNerve Tissue ProteinsNuclear ProteinsPeptidesProtein IsoformsSpinocerebellar Ataxias14-3-3 ProteinsAtaxin-1AtaxinsATXN1 protein, humanNerve Tissue ProteinsNuclear ProteinsPeptidespolyglutamineProtein Isoforms

Identifiers

PMID20155408
OpenAlexW2008990665

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.