Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20155388›Full record

ReviewPharmaceutical research2010

New techniques for drug delivery to the posterior eye segment.

Esther Eljarrat-Binstock, Jacob Pe'er, Abraham J Domb

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmaceutical research, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
7.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 141 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Innovative triamcinolone acetonide microsuspension for Non-Invasive ocular management of inflammation.Daru : journal of Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Light-responsive biomaterials for ocular drug delivery.Drug delivery and translational research · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Preparation andDrug delivery · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Esther Eljarrat-BinstockDepartment of Medicinal Chemistry and Natural Products, School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, 91120, Israel.
Jacob Pe'er
Abraham J Domb
Hebrew University of Jerusalem · ILHadassah Medical Center · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ocular drug delivery has become an increasingly important field of research especially when treating posterior segment diseases of the eye, such as age-related macular degeneration, diabetic retinopathy, posterior uveitis and retinitis. These diseases are the leading causes of vision loss in developed countries which require repeated long-term administration of therapeutic agents. New drugs for the medication of the posterior ocular segment have emerged, but most drugs are delivered by repeated intravitreal injections associated with ocular complications. Advances in ocular drug delivery system research are expected to provide new tools for the treatment of the posterior segment diseases, providing improved drug penetration, prolonged action, higher efficacy, improved safety and less invasive administration, resulting in higher patient compliance. This review provides an insight into the recent progress and trends in ocular drug delivery systems for treating posterior eye segment diseases, with an emphasis on transscleral iontophoresis.

Indexed as

AnimalsDrug Delivery SystemsEyeHumansIontophoresisPharmaceutical PreparationsPharmaceutical Preparations

Identifiers

PMID20155388
OpenAlexW1992644094

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.