Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20155361›Full record

ReviewEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2010

Contemporary management of cancer of the oral cavity.

Eric M Genden, Alfio Ferlito, Carl E Silver, Robert P Takes, Carlos Suárez, Randall P Owen, Missak Haigentz, Sandro J Stoeckli, Ashok R Shaha, Alexander D Rapidis and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Glycolytic pathway candidate markers in the prognosis of oral squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review with meta-analysis.Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologica · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Prediction of bone invasion of oral squamous cell carcinoma using a magnetic resonance imaging-based machine learning model.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Wnt/β-Catenin Signaling in Oral Carcinogenesis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  13. MET ectodomain shedding is associated with poor disease-free survival of patients diagnosed with oral squamous cell carcinoma.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2020
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Eric M GendenDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Alfio Ferlito
Carl E Silver
Robert P Takes
Carlos Suárez
Randall P Owen
Missak Haigentz
Sandro J Stoeckli
Ashok R Shaha
Alexander D Rapidis
Juan Pablo Rodrigo
Alessandra Rinaldo

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oral cancer represents a common entity comprising a third of all head and neck malignant tumors. The options for curative treatment of oral cavity cancer have not changed significantly in the last three decades; however, the work up, the approach to surveillance, and the options for reconstruction have evolved significantly. Because of the profound functional and cosmetic importance of the oral cavity, management of oral cavity cancers requires a thorough understanding of disease progression, approaches to management and options for reconstruction. The purpose of this review is to discuss the most current management options for oral cavity cancers.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorBiopsyCombined Modality TherapyDiagnostic ImagingHumansMouth NeoplasmsNeoplasm InvasivenessPlastic Surgery ProceduresPrecancerous ConditionsPrognosisRisk FactorsSentinel Lymph Node BiopsyBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID20155361
PMCPMC2874025

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.