Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20155295›Full record

SynthesisClinical rheumatology2010

Off-label use of rituximab in systemic lupus erythematosus: a systematic review.

Eleanor Murray, Martin Perry

Open access · bronzeAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical rheumatology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. [The LUNAR study: rituximab for lupus nephritis?].Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie · 2013
    Trial
  5. B Cell Aberrance in Lupus: the Ringleader and the Solution.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2022
    Review
  6. [New treatments for systemic lupus erythematosus].Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie · 2020
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Treatment of catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome.Current opinion in rheumatology · 2016
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Rituximab and lupus--a promising pair?Current rheumatology reports · 2014
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Belimumab in systemic lupus erythematosus: an update for clinicians.Therapeutic advances in chronic disease · 2012
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus.Current neuropharmacology · 2011
    Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Eleanor MurrayWestern Infirmary General, G-3/4, Glasgow, G11 6NT, UK. eleanormurray@doctors.org.uk
Martin Perry
Glasgow Royal Infirmary · GBWestern Infirmary · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Considerable interest in the efficacy of rituximab (a monoclonal CD20 antibody) in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) has been generated due to its unique mode of action, culminating in a series of randomized and open trials, and case reports. However, this use is off-license and two significant RCTs have reported negative findings, reopening the debate on clinical benefit. This review of the available data suggests that rituximab induces B-cell depletion in 95% of patients, and a significant reduction in disease activity is achieved with a relatively good safety profile in patients with SLE.

Indexed as

Off-Label UseAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-DerivedB-LymphocytesDown-RegulationHumansLupus Erythematosus, SystemicRituximabAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-DerivedRituximab

Identifiers

PMID20155295
PMCPMC7102216
OpenAlexW1967808109

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.