Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20154739›Full record

ArticleBone marrow transplantation2010

The role of allogeneic SCT in primary myelofibrosis: a British Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation study.

W A Stewart, R Pearce, K E Kirkland, A Bloor, K Thomson, J Apperley, G McQuaker, D I Marks, C Craddock, S McCann and 4 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Bone marrow transplantation, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation in Myelofibrosis.Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation · 2017
    Review
  7. [Advances in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for myelofibrosis].Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi · 2017
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Current Challenges in Stem Cell Transplantation in Myelofibrosis.Current hematologic malignancy reports · 2015
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Molecular pathways: Jak/STAT pathway: mutations, inhibitors, and resistance.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2013
    Review
  20. Emerging drugs for myelofibrosis.Expert opinion on emerging drugs · 2012
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 11 institutions in 3 countries.

W A StewartCancer Science Institute, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
R Pearce
K E Kirkland
A Bloor
K Thomson
J Apperley
G McQuaker
D I Marks
C Craddock
S McCann
N Russell
G Cook
P D Kottaridis
British Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation
Guy's Hospital · GBGlasgow Royal Infirmary · GBImperial College London · GBNational University of Singapore · SGNorth Bristol NHS Trust · GBQueen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham · GBSt. James's Hospital · IESt James's University Hospital · GBThe Christie Hospital · GBThe Royal Free Hospital · GBUniversity College London · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_G0802523
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fifty-one patients with primary myelofibrosis (PMF) received allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplants from related (n=33) or unrelated (n=18) donors. Twenty-seven patients, 19-54 years old, were prepared with myeloablative regimens including CY plus BU (n=4) or TBI (n=23). Twenty-four patients, 40-64 years old, received reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens. All RIC regimens contained fludarabine, combined with melphalan (n=19) or BU (n=5), and alemtuzumab or anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) in the majority (n=19). Four patients (17%) in the RIC group had primary graft failure. Previous splenectomy reduced time to engraftment in the RIC group (13 versus 20 days; P=0.008). For MA and RIC groups, respectively, at 3 years, overall survival rates were 44 and 31% (P=0.67), progression-free survival 44 and 24% (P=0.87), and actuarial relapse rates 15 and 46% (P=0.06). Non-relapse mortality at 3 years was 41% for the myeloablative and 32% for the RIC group. Acute GVHD occurred in 29 and 38% of patients in the myeloablative and RIC groups, respectively. Extensive chronic GVHD developed in 30 and 35% of evaluable patients, respectively.

Indexed as

AdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPeripheral Blood Stem Cell TransplantationPrimary MyelofibrosisRetrospective StudiesTransplantation ConditioningTransplantation, HomologousYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID20154739
OpenAlexW1973587793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.