Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20154538›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of trauma2010

Intestinal mucus layer preservation in female rats attenuates gut injury after trauma-hemorrhagic shock.

Sharvil U Sheth, Qi Lu, Kate Twelker, Susan M Sharpe, Xiaofa Qin, Diego C Reino, Marlon A Lee, Da-Zhong Xu, Edwin A Deitch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of trauma, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Redefining the gut as the motor of critical illness.Trends in molecular medicine · 2014
    Review
  3. Low doses of celecoxib attenuate gut barrier failure during experimental peritonitis.Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology · 2013
    Article
  4. Loss of MLK3 signaling impedes ulcer healing by modulating MAPK signaling in mouse intestinal mucosa.American journal of physiology. Gastrointestinal and liver physiology · 2012
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sharvil U ShethDepartment of Surgery, UMDNJ-New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey 07103, USA.
Qi Lu
Kate Twelker
Susan M Sharpe
Xiaofa Qin
Diego C Reino
Marlon A Lee
Da-Zhong Xu
Edwin A Deitch

Funding

THE ROLE OF GENDER ON GUT AND GUT-INDUCED LUNG INJURYP50GM069790 · NIGMS · UNIV OF MED/DENT OF NJ-NJ MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI LIVINGSTON, DAVID H · 2006 to 2010
$8.0M
Shock, Trauma and Gut Origin SepsisR01GM059841 · NIGMS · UNIV OF MED/DENT OF NJ-NJ MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI DEITCH, EDWIN A · 1999 to 2012
$5.6M
Training in Trauma and Surgical Critical Care ResearchT32GM069330 · NIGMS · UNIV OF MED/DENT OF NJ-NJ MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI LIVINGSTON, DAVID H · 2004 to 2015
$1.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM 59841NIGMS NIH HHS P50 GM069790NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM059841NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM069330PHS HHS T32 069330
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe tested the hypothesis that females are more resistant to trauma-hemorrhagic shock (T/HS)-induced gut injury than males, and this is related to better preservation of their intestinal mucus layer, which is influenced in turn by the estrus cycle stage at the time of injury.

methodsMale, proestrus and diestrus female rats underwent a laparotomy (trauma) and 90 minutes of shock ( approximately 35 mm Hg). At 3 hours after reperfusion, terminal ileum was harvested and stained with Carnoy's Alcian Blue for mucus assessment, hematoxylin and eosin, and periodic acid schiff for villous and goblet cell morphology and injury. Ileal permeability was measured in separate intestinal segments using the ex vivo everted gut sac technique.

resultsWhen compared with males, proestrus female rats were significantly more resistant to T/HS-induced morphologic gut injury, as reflected in both a lower incidence of villous injury (14% vs. 22%; p < 0.05) and a lesser grade of injury (1.0 vs. 2.8; p < 0.05) as well as preservation of gut barrier function (17.9 vs. 32.2; p < 0.05). This resistance to gut injury was associated with significant preservation of the mucus layer (87% vs. 62%; p < 0.05) and was influenced by the estrus cycle stage of the female rats. There was a significant inverse correlation between mucus layer coverage and the incidence (r = 0.9; p < 0.0001) and magnitude (r = 0.89; p < 0.0001) of villous injury and gut permeability (r = 0.74; p < 0.001).

conclusionsThe resistance of female rats to T/HS-induced intestinal injury and dysfunction was associated with better preservation of the intestinal mucus barrier and was to some extent estrus cycle-dependent. Preservation of the mucus barrier may protect against shock-induced gut injury and subsequent distant organ injury by limiting the ability of luminal contents such as bacteria and digestive enzymes from coming into direct contact with the epithelium.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell Membrane PermeabilityEstrusFemaleIleumIntestinal MucosaMaleMultiple Organ FailureRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyShock, Hemorrhagic

Identifiers

PMID20154538
PMCPMC3024717

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.