Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20154218›Full record

ArticleBlood2010

Impact of interactions of cellular components of the bone marrow microenvironment on hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell function.

Brahmananda R Chitteti, Ying-Hua Cheng, Bradley Poteat, Sonia Rodriguez-Rodriguez, W Scott Goebel, Nadia Carlesso, Melissa A Kacena, Edward F Srour

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Blood, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 69 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
69citing papers in PubMed
9.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

69 citing papers in PubMed, 124 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. ASPORIN: A root of the matter in tumors and their host environment.Biochimica et biophysica acta. Reviews on cancer · 2024
    Review
  9. Neonatal Osteomacs and Bone Marrow Macrophages Differ in Phenotypic Marker Expression and Function.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. The emerging role of bone marrow adipose tissue in bone health and dysfunction.Journal of molecular medicine (Berlin, Germany) · 2017
    Review

9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Brahmananda R ChittetiDepartments of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Ying-Hua Cheng
Bradley Poteat
Sonia Rodriguez-Rodriguez
W Scott Goebel
Nadia Carlesso
Melissa A Kacena
Edward F Srour
Pediatrics and Genetics · USIndiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis · USIndiana University School of Medicine

Funding

Tumor Microenvironment and Metastasis ProgramP30CA082709 · NCI · INDIANA UNIV-PURDUE UNIV AT INDIANAPOLIS · PI AMBER L. MOSLEY · 1999 to 2026
$59.3M
Extrinsic Modulation of Hematopoietic Stem Cell FateR01HL055716 · NHLBI · INDIANA UNIV-PURDUE UNIV AT INDIANAPOLIS · PI SROUR, EDWARD F · 1995 to 2010
$2.7M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA082709NHLBI NIH HHS HL55716NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL055716
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hematopoietic stem (HSC) and progenitor (HPC) cell fate is governed by intrinsic and extrinsic parameters. We examined the impact of hematopoietic niche elements on HSC and HPC function by analyzing the combined effect of osteoblasts (OBs) and stromal cells (SCs) on Lineage(-)Sca-1(+)CD117(+) (LSK) cells. CFU expansion and marrow repopulating potential of cultured Lineage(-)Sca-1(+)CD117(+) cells were significantly higher in OB compared with SC cultures, thus corroborating the importance of OBs in the competence of the hematopoietic niche. OB-mediated enhancement of HSC and HPC function was reduced in cocultures of OBs and SCs, suggesting that SCs suppressed the OB-mediated hematopoiesis-enhancing activity. Although the suppressive effect of SC was mediated by adipocytes, probably through up-regulation of neuropilin-1, the OB-mediated enhanced hematopoiesis function was elaborated through Notch signaling. Expression of Notch 2, Jagged 1 and 2, Delta 1 and 4, Hes 1 and 5, and Deltex was increased in OB cultures and suppressed in SC and OB/SC cultures. Phenotypic fractionation of OBs did not segregate the hematopoiesis-enhancing activity but demonstrated that this function is common to OBs from different anatomic sites. These data illustrate that OBs promote in vitro maintenance of hematopoietic functions, including repopulating potential by up-regulating Notch-mediated signaling between HSCs and OBs.

Indexed as

AnimalsBone MarrowCell CommunicationCell DifferentiationCell ProliferationCells, CulturedCell SeparationCoculture TechniquesFlow CytometryHematopoiesisHematopoietic Stem CellsMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMice, KnockoutOsteoblastsReceptors, NotchReceptors, Notch

Identifiers

PMID20154218
PMCPMC2858485
OpenAlexW2090774791

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.