Evidence map›Paper›PMID 2015418›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of pharmacology1991

Differences between the effects of cromakalim and nifedipine on agonist-induced responses in rabbit aorta.

K M Bray, A H Weston, S Duty, D T Newgreen, J Longmore, G Edwards, T J Brown

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of pharmacology, 1991. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Monophasic action potentials and CaNetherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation · 2003
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Pharmacology of the potassium channel openers.Cardiovascular drugs and therapy · 1995
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

K M BrayDepartment of Physiological Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, University of Manchester.
A H Weston
S Duty
D T Newgreen
J Longmore
G Edwards
T J Brown
University of Manchester · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

1. The effects of cromakalim on endothelium-denuded rabbit aortic strips were compared with those of the calcium (Ca2+) entry blocking agent, nifedipine. 2. Pre-incubation with cromakalim or nifedipine had no significant effect on the initial phasic component of noradrenaline (NA)-induced responses. 3. Cromakalim (0.3-10 microM), but not nifedipine, inhibited the maintained tonic contractions produced by NA. The effects of cromakalim were antagonized by raising extracellular [K+] or by glibenclamide. 4. Nifedipine inhibited contractions produced by KCl (40 mM) whereas cromakalim had no effect. 5. In Ca2(+)-free physiological salt solution (PSS), cromakalim produced a significant inhibition of both the refilling of and the release of Ca2+ from NA-releasable Ca2+ stores, whereas nifedipine was ineffective. 6. In tissues preloaded with 42K+ cromakalim (0.3-10 microM) produced a concentration-dependent increase in the 42K+ efflux rate coefficient. NA (0.3 microM) also produced an increase in the rate of efflux of 42K+, an effect which was not antagonized by nifedipine (0.3 microM). 7. When microelectrodes were used, cromakalim (1-10 microM) produced a maintained concentration-dependent membrane hyperpolarization. However, low concentrations of cromakalim (less than 1 microM) which relaxed the aorta had no effect on membrane potential. NA had no significant effect on membrane potential. 9. It is concluded that the ability of cromakalim to relax NA-induced contractions in rabbit aorta is not exerted by the indirect closure of nifedipine-sensitive Ca2+ channels. Instead, cromakalim may exert a direct inhibitory action on Ca2+ uptake into and release from Ca2+ stores and additionally inhibit the pathway through which Ca2+ passes from the extracellular fluid to intracellular Ca2+ stores.

Indexed as

AnimalsAorta, ThoracicBenzopyransCalciumCromakalimIn Vitro TechniquesMaleMembrane PotentialsNifedipineNorepinephrinePotassiumPyrrolesRabbitsVasodilationBenzopyransCalciumCromakalimNifedipineNorepinephrinePotassiumPyrroles

Identifiers

PMID2015418
PMCPMC1918015
OpenAlexW1983680020

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.