Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20153556›Full record

ArticleAtencion primaria2010

[Impact of the Tobacco Law on the workplace: a follow up study of a cohort of workers in Spain 2005-2007].

M de Lluc Bauzà-Amengual, Manuel Blasco-González, Elena Sánchez-Vazquez, Inmaculada Pereiró-Berenguer, Nidia Ruiz-Varea, Jordi Pericás-Beltran

Open access · greenAbstract readEnglish AbstractMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Atencion primaria, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

M de Lluc Bauzà-AmengualDepartament d'Infermería i Fisioteràpia, Universitat Illes Balears, Islas Baleares, España. mlluc.bauza@uib.es
Manuel Blasco-González
Elena Sánchez-Vazquez
Inmaculada Pereiró-Berenguer
Nidia Ruiz-Varea
Jordi Pericás-Beltran
Departamento de Salud · ESUniversitat de les Illes Balears · ESHospital de Sagunto · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of this study is to describe the changes caused by the Law on Tobacco and its consumption in workers who are active smokers.

designA post-intervention follow up study of a cohort of users.

settingHealth Centres in Valencia and Majorca.

participantsUsers who attended health centres.

interventionThe field work consisted of each patient filling in a case report form with the requested information. MAIN MEASUREMENTS: The variables collected were, sex, place of work, education level, number of workers in the company, number of cigarettes smoked. They were told that on the following day they had to count the cigarettes smoked throughout the day, noting whether they had been smoked during or outside working hours. If they smoked during working hours, they reported whether it was inside or outside the workplace. On the following day they were telephoned to let us know the number of cigarettes smoked. This telephone call was repeated at six months and eighteen months.

resultsSmoking prevalence and the number of cigarettes smoked in the workplace has been reduced by 9% per month. The variables associated with compliance with the law were education level, the sex of the worker, and the size of the company.

conclusionsThe coming into force of the Tobacco Law has been effective.

Indexed as

AdultCohort StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleOccupational HealthSmokingSpain

Identifiers

PMID20153556
PMCPMC7024439
OpenAlexW1988930968

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.