Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20153193›Full record

ArticleCurrent biology : CB2010

Both interaction surfaces within cohesin's hinge domain are essential for its stable chromosomal association.

Ajay Mishra, Bin Hu, Alexander Kurze, Frédéric Beckouët, Ana-Maria Farcas, Sarah E Dixon, Yuki Katou, Syma Khalid, Katsuhiko Shirahige, Kim Nasmyth

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current biology : CB, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Suppressor mutation analysis combined with 3D modeling explains cohesin's capacity to hold and release DNA.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Linking chromosome duplication and segregation via sister chromatid cohesion.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2014
    Review
  11. Pds5 promotes and protects cohesin acetylation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2013
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Sister chromatid cohesion.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2012
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ajay MishraDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3QU, UK.
Bin Hu
Alexander Kurze
Frédéric Beckouët
Ana-Maria Farcas
Sarah E Dixon
Yuki Katou
Syma Khalid
Katsuhiko Shirahige
Kim Nasmyth
University of Oxford · GBTokyo Institute of Technology · JPUniversity of Southampton · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UKWellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe cohesin complex that mediates sister chromatid cohesion contains three core subunits: Smc1, Smc3, and Scc1. Heterotypic interactions between Smc1 and Smc3 dimerization domains create stable V-shaped Smc1/Smc3 heterodimers with a hinge at the center and nucleotide-binding domains (NBDs) at the ends of each arm. Interconnection of each NBD through their association with the N- and C-terminal domains of Scc1 creates a tripartite ring, within which sister DNAs are thought to be entrapped (the ring model). Crystal structures show that the Smc1/Smc3 hinge has a toroidal shape, with independent "north" and "south" interaction surfaces on an axis of pseudosymmetry. The ring model predicts that sister chromatid cohesion would be lost by transient hinge opening.

resultsWe find that mutations within either interface weaken heterodimerization of isolated half hinges in vitro but do not greatly compromise formation of cohesin rings in vivo. They do, however, reduce the residence time of cohesin on chromosomes and cause lethal defects in sister chromatid cohesion. This demonstrates that mere formation of rings is insufficient for cohesin function. Stable cohesion requires cohesin rings that cannot easily open.

conclusionsEither the north or south hinge interaction surface is sufficient for the assembly of V-shaped Smc1/Smc3 heterodimers in vivo. Any tendency of Smc proteins with weakened hinges to dissociate will be suppressed by interconnection of their NBDs by Scc1. We suggest that transient hinge dissociation caused by the mutations described here is incompatible with stable sister chromatid cohesion because it permits chromatin fibers to escape from cohesin rings.

Indexed as

Models, MolecularAmino Acid SequenceCell Cycle ProteinsChromatidsChromatography, GelChromosomal Proteins, Non-HistoneCohesinsCrystallizationDimerizationMolecular Sequence DataMutationProtein Structure, TertiarySchizosaccharomyces pombe ProteinsSpecies SpecificityStructural Maintenance of Chromosome Protein 1YeastsCell Cycle ProteinsChromosomal Proteins, Non-HistoneCohesinspsm3 protein, S pombeSchizosaccharomyces pombe ProteinsStructural Maintenance of Chromosome Protein 1

Identifiers

PMID20153193
PMCPMC2852676
OpenAlexW2027351887

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.