Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20153192›Full record

ArticleCurrent biology : CB2010

Regulation of gustatory physiology and appetitive behavior by the Drosophila circadian clock.

Abhishek Chatterjee, Shintaro Tanoue, Jerry H Houl, Paul E Hardin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current biology : CB, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Organismal landscape of clock cells and circadian gene expression inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Metabolism and growth adaptation to environmental conditions in Drosophila.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2020
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Neural plasticity · 2017
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Socially synchronized circadian oscillators.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2013
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Abhishek ChatterjeeDepartment of Biology and Center for Biological Clocks Research, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843-3258, USA.
Shintaro Tanoue
Jerry H Houl
Paul E Hardin

Funding

Circadian Regulation of OlfactionR01DC004857 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON · PI DRYER, STUART E. · 2001 to 2004
$1.1M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC004857
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCircadian regulation of chemosensory processes is common in animals, but little is known about how circadian clocks control chemosensory systems or the consequences of rhythms in chemosensory system function. Taste is a major chemosensory gate used to decide whether or not an animal will eat, and the main taste organ in Drosophila, the proboscis, harbors autonomous circadian oscillators. Here we examine gustatory physiology, tastant-evoked appetitive behavior, and food ingestion to understand clock-dependent regulation of the Drosophila gustatory system.

resultsHere we report that single-unit responses from labellar gustatory receptor neurons (GRNs) to attractive and aversive tastants show diurnal and circadian rhythms in spike amplitude, frequency, and duration across different classes of gustatory sensilla. Rhythms in electrophysiological responses parallel behavioral rhythms in proboscis extension reflex. Molecular oscillators in GRNs are necessary and sufficient for rhythms in gustatory responses and drive rhythms in G protein-coupled receptor kinase 2 (GPRK2) expression that mediate rhythms in taste sensitivity. Eliminating clock function in certain GRNs increases feeding and locomotor activity, mimicking a starvation response.

conclusionsCircadian clocks in GRNs control neuronal output and drive behavioral rhythms in taste responses that peak at a time of day when feeding is maximal in flies. Our results argue that oscillations in GPRK2 levels drive rhythms in gustatory physiology and behavior and that GRN clocks repress feeding. The similarity in gustatory system organization and feeding behavior in flies and mammals, as well as diurnal changes in taste sensitivity in humans, suggest that our results are relevant to the situation in humans.

Indexed as

Analysis of VarianceAnimalsAppetitive BehaviorBasic-Leucine Zipper Transcription FactorsBlotting, WesternChemoreceptor CellsCircadian RhythmDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsElectrophysiologyFluorescent Antibody TechniqueG-Protein-Coupled Receptor Kinase 2Receptors, Cell SurfaceTasteBasic-Leucine Zipper Transcription FactorsDrosophila ProteinsGprk2 protein, DrosophilaG-Protein-Coupled Receptor Kinase 2gustatory receptor, DrosophilaPDP1 protein, DrosophilaReceptors, Cell Surface

Identifiers

PMID20153192
PMCPMC4234688

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.