Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20152143›Full record

ReviewCurrent biology : CB2010

Common mechanisms of synaptic plasticity in vertebrates and invertebrates.

David L Glanzman

Abstract readHistorical ArticleReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current biology : CB, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. As soon as there was life, there was danger: the deep history of survival behaviours and the shallower history of consciousness.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

David L GlanzmanDepartment of Physiological Science, UCLA College, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1606, USA. dglanzman@physci.ucla.edu

Funding

PLASTICITY AT SENSORIMOTOR SYNAPSES IN CULTURER01NS029563 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI GLANZMAN, DAVID L · 1992 to 2017
$2.6M
Mechanisms of Long-Term Memory Maintenance in Aplysia.R01MH096120 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI GLANZMAN, DAVID L · 2012 to 2016
$1.9M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH096120NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS029563
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Until recently, the literature on learning-related synaptic plasticity in invertebrates has been dominated by models assuming plasticity is mediated by presynaptic changes, whereas the vertebrate literature has been dominated by models assuming it is mediated by postsynaptic changes. Here I will argue that this situation does not reflect a biological reality and that, in fact, invertebrate and vertebrate nervous systems share a common set of mechanisms of synaptic plasticity.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalAnimalsHistory, 20th CenturyInvertebratesLearningLong-Term PotentiationLong-Term Synaptic DepressionNeuronal PlasticityResearchVertebrates

Identifiers

PMID20152143
PMCPMC5125775

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.