Evidence map›Paper›PMID 2015198›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of experimental pathology1991

Differential sensitivity to hyperthermia of the F1 and F10 B16 melanoma variants.

J Leibovici, G Klorin, M Huszar, S Hoenig, M Michowitz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of experimental pathology, 1991. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 87% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

J LeiboviciDepartment of Pathology, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Israel.
G Klorin
M Huszar
S Hoenig
M Michowitz
Tel Aviv University · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The currently available antitumoral therapeutic modalities are most often inefficient against metastatic disease. The metastatic phenotype has been shown to be largely determined by cell membrane properties. The cell membrane could therefore be considered as a possible target for antimetastatic drugs. In the present study we examined the effect of hyperthermia (the antitumoral effect of which is based, at least partly, on an action on the cell membrane) on the F1 and F10 variants of B16 melanoma. Cells of the more malignant variant, F10, were found to be markedly more sensitive to hyperthermic treatment than those of the less malignant one, F1. One hour in-vitro treatment by supranormal temperatures (ranging from 40 to 46 degrees C) resulted in a differential effect with regard to both proliferating capacity of the cells in vitro and tumorigenic ability following inoculation to mice. Our present results in the B16 melanoma corroborate data obtained by us in another tumour system, the AKR lymphoma. Study of the effect of membrane-acting agents on tumour variants differing in degree of malignancy might result in the finding of antitumoral agents efficient against advanced cancer.

Indexed as

Hyperthermia, InducedNeoplasm MetastasisAnimalsCarcinogenicity TestsCell SurvivalMaleMelanoma, ExperimentalMiceMice, Inbred C57BLTumor Cells, Cultured

Identifiers

PMID2015198
PMCPMC2002304
OpenAlexW2221514169

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.