Filtering FRAX.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

1. A non-invasive prevention program model for the assessment of osteoporosis in the early postmenopausal period: a pilot study on FRAX(®) and QUS tools advantages.Journal of endocrinological investigation · 2016
   Article
2. Agreement between FRAX scores calculated with and without bone mineral density in women with osteopenia in Turkey.Clinical rheumatology · 2014
   Article
3. Assessment of fracture risk.Current osteoporosis reports · 2012
   Review
4. High fracture probability with FRAX usually indicates densitometric osteoporosis: implications for clinical practice.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2012
   Article
5. Assessment of individual fracture risk: FRAX and beyond.Current osteoporosis reports · 2010
   Article
6. The US FRAX filter: avoiding confusion or hindering progress?Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2010
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Commented on by
  The US FRAX filter: avoiding confusion or hindering progress?2010

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as