Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20151132›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of surgery2010

The effect of obstruction and perforation on colorectal cancer disease-free survival.

Yik-Hong Ho, Simon K K Siu, Petra Buttner, Andrew Stevenson, John Lumley, Russel Stitz

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of surgery, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Prognostic Factors for Survival in Transverse Colon Cancers.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Young colorectal cancer patients often present too late.International journal of colorectal disease · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Yik-Hong HoDepartment of Surgery, School of Medicine and Dentistry, North Queensland Centre for Cancer Research, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD, Australia. yikhong.ho@jcu.edu.au
Simon K K Siu
Petra Buttner
Andrew Stevenson
John Lumley
Russel Stitz
Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital · AUJames Cook University · AUUniversity of Queensland · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundObstruction (OBSTR) and perforation (PERF) in colorectal cancer impact adversely upon outcomes, and cancer-related survival may also be affected. However, data are sparse, particularly on disease-free survival (DFS) where the cancer is both obstructed and perforated (OBS-PERF).

methodsData were extracted from a prospectively collected database of 1876 colorectal cancer patients managed and followed up at the Royal Brisbane Hospital from 1984 to 2004. The patients who had curative surgery (n = 1426) were classified as OBSTR (n = 153), PERF (n = 53), OBS-PERF (n = 19), and uncomplicated (UNCOM; n = 1201). Kaplan-Meier survival and Cox proportional hazard analyses were performed.

resultsPostoperative mortality within 30 days of surgery was 1.5% (n = 22) and the overall complication rate was 40.8% (n = 582). However, only 7.2% (n = 102) required reoperations. The median survival time was 71 (IQR = 64.9-77.1) months and the median follow-up for DFS was 37.5 (IQR 14-68) months. The overall recurrence rate was 32.7% (n = 466), the local recurrence rate was 9.4% (n = 135), and local and distant recurrences occurred in the same patient in 4.7% (n = 67). Male gender, OBSTR, PERF, OBS-PERF, emergency operation, major medical and surgical complications, reoperation, TNM staging, tumor grading, and tumor venous invasion adversely affected DFS (p < 0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that OBS-PERF (p = 0.008), major medical complications (p = 0.011), reoperation (p = 0.018), TNM staging (p < 0.001), grading (p = 0.018), and venous invasion (p = 0.002) were independently associated with a poorer DFS.

conclusionsOBS-PERF colorectal cancer is associated with a poorer DFS, which may be worse than either OBSTR or PERF alone.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overColorectal NeoplasmsDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansIntestinal ObstructionIntestinal PerforationKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedProportional Hazards ModelsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID20151132
OpenAlexW2038127514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.