ArticleDer Anaesthesist2010
[Chest compression quality : Can feedback technology help?].
Article in Der Anaesthesist, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00449969 (Quality of Out-of-hospital Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Quality of Out-of-hospital Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) With Real Time Automated Feedback: a Prospective Randomized Study
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of the Cardio First Angel™ device on CPR indices: a randomized controlled clinical trial.Critical care (London, England) · 2016Trial
- External chest compressions using a mechanical feedback device : cross-over simulation study.Der Anaesthesist · 2011Trial
- Monitoring of in-hospital cardiac arrest events with the focus on Automated External Defibrillators--a retrospective observational study.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2015Observational
- [Real-time feedback systems for improvement of resuscitation quality].Der Anaesthesist · 2011Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe outcome of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) depends on the quality of chest compressions. Current European Resuscitation Council (ERC) guidelines promote the development of feedback systems. However, no studies presenting satisfactory results of feedback use have been published.
methodsA total of 60 patients with cardiac arrest (> or =18 years of age) received resuscitation attempts using an automated external defibrillator (AED) with real-time feedback by the ambulance service of the City of Münster. The frequency of chest compressions, no-flow time (NFT) and depth of chest compressions were analyzed for the first three cycles of CPR and compared to the ERC guidelines 2005.
resultsChest compression frequency did not differ significantly from the ideal as set out in the guidelines. Analysis of NFTs showed significantly longer NFT for the first cycle but NFT for the second and third cycles did not differ significantly from the ideal. The target depth of 4-5 cm was achieved in 80% of all chest compressions in the first 3 cycles.
conclusionWith the AED real-time feedback technology used in this study standardized performance of chest compressions could be maintained in a professional ambulance service. Implementation of a feedback system requires training of ambulance staff.
Indexed as
Identifiers
20151103What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.