Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20151038›Full record

ArticleAnnual review of analytical chemistry (Palo Alto, Calif.)2008

In Vitro Electrochemistry of Biological Systems.

Kelly L Adams, Maja Puchades, Andrew G Ewing

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annual review of analytical chemistry (Palo Alto, Calif.), 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Electrical Detection of Innate Immune Cells.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. High-resolution imaging of cellular dopamine efflux using a fluorescent nanosensor array.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Introduction to biosensors.Essays in biochemistry · 2016
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. New trends in the electrochemical sensing of dopamine.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2013
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kelly L AdamsPennsylvania State University, Department of Chemistry, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802.
Maja Puchades
Andrew G Ewing

Funding

Electroanalytical Probes of ExocytosisR01EB000352 · NIBIB · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY-UNIV PARK · PI EWING, ANDREW G · 2002 to 2009
$1.8M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB000352
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article reviews recent work involving electrochemical methods for in vitro analysis of biomolecules, with an emphasis on detection and manipulation at and of single cells and cultures of cells. The techniques discussed include constant potential amperometry, chronoamperometry, cellular electroporation, scanning electrochemical microscopy, and microfluidic platforms integrated with electrochemical detection. The principles of these methods are briefly described, followed in most cases with a short description of an analytical or biological application and its significance. The use of electrochemical methods to examine specific mechanistic issues in exocytosis is highlighted, as a great deal of recent work has been devoted to this application.

Identifiers

PMID20151038
PMCPMC2819529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.