Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20150897›Full record

ReviewThe EMBO journal2010

New insights into an old story: Agrobacterium-induced tumour formation in plants by plant transformation.

Andrea Pitzschke, Heribert Hirt

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The EMBO journal, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 100 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
100citing papers in PubMed
13.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

100 citing papers in PubMed, 270 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Plant susceptible responses: the underestimated side of plant-pathogen interactions.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. The Only Chemoreceptor Encoded byMicroorganisms · 2021
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Frontiers in plant science · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Frontiers in plant science · 2020
    Article
  20. Article

40 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Andrea PitzschkeDepartment of Applied Genetics and Cell Biology, University of Natural Resources and Applied Life Sciences, Muthgasse 18, Vienna, Austria.
Heribert Hirt
BOKU University · ATUniversity of Vienna · AT

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF P 21851
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Agrobacterium tumefaciens causes tumour formation in plants. Plant signals induce in the bacteria the expression of a range of virulence (Vir) proteins and the formation of a type IV secretion system (T4SS). On attachment to plant cells, a transfer DNA (T-DNA) and Vir proteins are imported into the host cells through the bacterial T4SS. Through interaction with a number of host proteins, the Vir proteins suppress the host innate immune system and support the transfer, nuclear targeting, and integration of T-DNA into host cell chromosomes. Owing to extensive genetic analyses, the bacterial side of the plant-Agrobacterium interaction is well understood. However, progress on the plant side has only been achieved recently, revealing a highly complex molecular choreography under the direction of the Vir proteins that impinge on multiple processes including transport, transcription, and chromosome status of their host cells.

Indexed as

Cell NucleusDNA, BacterialModels, BiologicalPlants, Genetically ModifiedPlant TumorsRhizobiumTransformation, GeneticVirulenceDNA, BacterialT-DNA

Identifiers

PMID20150897
PMCPMC2845280
OpenAlexW2141205707

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.