Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20150340›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2010

On the utility of short intron sequences as a reference for the detection of positive and negative selection in Drosophila.

John Parsch, Sergey Novozhilov, Sarah S Saminadin-Peter, Karen M Wong, Peter Andolfatto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Estimating the evolutionary fitness of specific synonymous codon changes.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

John ParschDepartment of Biology II, University of Munich, Planegg-Martinsried, Germany. parsch@bio.lmu.de
Sergey Novozhilov
Sarah S Saminadin-Peter
Karen M Wong
Peter Andolfatto

Funding

Adaptive evolution of non coding DNA and gene expression divergence in DrosophilaR01GM083228 · NIGMS · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI ANDOLFATTO, PETER · 2009 to 2013
$1.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM083228-01A2NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM083228
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The detection of selection, both positive and negative, acting on a DNA sequence or class of nucleotide sites requires comparison with a reference sequence that is unaffected by selection. In Drosophila, recent findings of widespread selective constraint, as well as adaptive evolution, in both coding and noncoding regions highlight the difficulties in choosing such a reference sequence. Here, we investigate the utility of short intron sequences as a reference for the detection of selection. For a set of 119 Drosophila melanogaster genes containing 195 short introns (<or=120 bp), we analyzed polymorphism and divergence at 1) 4-fold synonymous sites, 2) all sites of introns <or=120 bp, 3) all sites of introns <or=65 bp, 4) bases 8-30 of introns <or=120 bp, and 5) bases 8-30 of introns <or=65 bp. The last class of sites shows the highest levels of both interspecific divergence and intraspecific polymorphism, suggesting that these sites are under the least selective constraint. Bases 8-30 of introns <or=65 bp also have the lowest ratio of divergence to polymorphism, which may indicate that a small proportion of substitutions in the other classes of sites are the result of adaptive evolution. Although there is little signal of selection on the primary sequence of short introns, patterns of insertion-deletion polymorphism and divergence suggest that both positive and negative selection act to maintain an optimal intron length.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularIntronsAnimalsDatabases, GeneticDrosophilaGenetic LinkageGenetics, PopulationINDEL MutationPolymorphism, GeneticSelection, GeneticStatistics, Nonparametric

Identifiers

PMID20150340
PMCPMC2877998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.