Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20149559›Full record

ArticleDrug and alcohol dependence2010

Subjective effects to marijuana associated with marijuana use in community and clinical subjects.

Joanna S Zeiger, Brett C Haberstick, Robin P Corley, Marissa A Ehringer, Thomas J Crowley, John K Hewitt, Christian J Hopfer, Michael C Stallings, Susan E Young, Soo Hyun Rhee

Abstract readTwin Study
In one paragraph

Article in Drug and alcohol dependence, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Pharmacotherapy for Cannabis Use Disorder: Preclinical and Clinical Models.Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Which came first: Cannabis use or deficits in impulse control?Progress in neuro-psychopharmacology & biological psychiatry · 2021
    Review
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Joanna S ZeigerInstitute for Behavioral Genetics, University of Colorado, 447 UCB, Boulder, CO 80309, United States. Joanna.Zeiger@Colorado.edu
Brett C Haberstick
Robin P Corley
Marissa A Ehringer
Thomas J Crowley
John K Hewitt
Christian J Hopfer
Michael C Stallings
Susan E Young
Soo Hyun Rhee

Funding

Wave IV Data CollectionP01HD031921 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI HARRIS, KATHLEEN MULLAN · 1994 to 2020
$86.1M
Twin StudyP60DA011015 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI HEWITT, JOHN K. · 1997 to 2013
$22.5M
GENETICS OF ADOLESCENT ANTISOCIAL DRUG DEPENDENCER01DA012845 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI HEWITT, JOHN K. · 2000 to 2012
$7.1M
Genetics of Adolescent Antisocial Drug DependenceR01DA021913 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI HOPFER, CHRISTIAN J · 2008 to 2013
$2.9M
NICHD NIH HHS HD031921NIDA NIH HHS P60 DA011015NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA012845NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA021913NIDA NIH HHS R01-DA021913PHS HHS NIDA011015PHS HHS NIDA012845
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMarijuana is the most commonly used illicit drug among adolescents. Marijuana use induces both psychological and physiological responses, which can be interpreted by an individual in a variety of ways (i.e. subjective effects). We have examined subjective effects in adolescent, young adult community, and clinical populations to determine how patterns of use may be predicted by an individual's subjective experiences with the drug.

methodParticipants were community and clinical sample subjects drawn from the Colorado Center of Antisocial Drug Dependence (CADD) and a sample of adjudicated youth from the Denver metropolitan area (aged 11-30). They were evaluated with the Composite International Diagnostic Interview-Substance Abuse Module (CIDI-SAM) and the Lyons battery for subjective effects. Scales for subjective effects were created using Mokken scale analysis. Multivariate linear and logistic regression was used to examine associations between the subjective scales and marijuana outcomes.

resultsMokken scaling revealed two subjective effects scales, positive and negative. Both scales were significantly positively associated with marijuana abuse or dependence in both the community and clinical sample and regular use in the community sample. The negative scale was negatively associated with past six-month use in the community sample (p<0.05) and clinical sample, after controlling for age and gender effects.

conclusionsThese findings suggest that diverse subjective experiences with marijuana can be ordered hierarchically and that the resulting short scales can be used in either clinical or community settings. Further, they suggest that the potential for marijuana use problems is related to the type of subjective experience from marijuana exposure.

Indexed as

AdolescentAge FactorsColoradoEthnicityFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHumansInterview, PsychologicalLogistic ModelsMaleMarijuana AbuseMarijuana SmokingPredictive Value of TestsPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesPsychological TestsSocioeconomic Factors

Identifiers

PMID20149559
PMCPMC3000695

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.