Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20148254›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of colorectal disease2010

High incidence of post-dural puncture headache in patients with spinal saddle block induced with Quincke needles for anorectal surgery: a randomised clinical trial.

Marc D Schmittner, Tom Terboven, Michael Dluzak, Andrea Janke, Marc E Limmer, Christel Weiss, Dieter G Bussen, Marc A Burmeister, Grietje C Beck

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of colorectal disease, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Postdural puncture headache.Korean journal of anesthesiology · 2017
    Review
  6. Article
  7. An alternative management procedure after inadvertent dural puncture.Journal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences · 2011
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Marc D SchmittnerDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Surgical Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167 Mannheim, Germany. marc.schmittner@umm.de
Tom Terboven
Michael Dluzak
Andrea Janke
Marc E Limmer
Christel Weiss
Dieter G Bussen
Marc A Burmeister
Grietje C Beck
University Medical Centre Mannheim · DEHelios Dr. Horst Schmidt Kliniken Wiesbaden · DEUniversität Hamburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSpinal saddle block represents nearly the ideal anaesthesia technique for anorectal surgery. Post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) is a dreaded complication but can be decreased by the use of non-cutting spinal needles to rates less than 1%. Though, cutting Quincke type needles are still widely used for economic reasons, leading to a higher rate of PDPH. We performed this study to demonstrate a reduction of PDPH by the use of very small 29-G compared with commonly used 25-G Quincke type spinal needles.

methodsTwo hundred sixteen adult patients (male/female, 19-83 years, ASA status I-III) were randomised 1:1 to groups, in which either a 25-G or a 29-G Quincke type spinal needle was used for a spinal saddle block. The incidence of PDPH was assessed during 1 week after surgery.

resultsThirty-nine of 216 patients developed PDPH but there was no difference between the two needle sizes (25-G, n = 18/106 vs. 29-G, n = 21/110, p = 0.6870). Women suffered significantly more from PDPH than men (23/86 vs. 16/130, p = 0.0069). Ambulatory patients had a later onset of PDPH than in-patients (24 h [0.5-72] vs. 2 h [0.2-96], p = 0.0002) and the headache was more severe in these patients (NRS 7 [2-10] vs. NRS 3 [1-8], p = 0.0009).

conclusionsThe use of 29-G compared with 25-G Quincke needles led to no reduction of PDPH and is considerably higher compared with data from pencil-point needles. The use of non-cutting or pencil-point spinal needles should become the standard for performing spinal saddle block.

Indexed as

Ambulatory CareAnal CanalAnesthesia, SpinalDigestive System Surgical ProceduresFemaleGermanyHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedNeedlesNerve BlockPost-Dural Puncture HeadacheRectum

Identifiers

PMID20148254
OpenAlexW2102762632

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.