Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20147893›Full record

ArticleNeuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology2010

Enhancement of attentional performance by selective stimulation of alpha4beta2(*) nAChRs: underlying cholinergic mechanisms.

William M Howe, Jinzhao Ji, Vinay Parikh, Sarah Williams, Elisabeth Mocaër, Caryn Trocmé-Thibierge, Martin Sarter

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 87 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
87citing papers in PubMed
9.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

87 citing papers in PubMed, 152 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Forebrain Cholinergic Signaling: Wired and Phasic, Not Tonic, and Causing Behavior.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Cholinergic Signaling Dynamics and Cognitive Control of Attention.Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2020
    Review

27 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

William M HoweDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Jinzhao Ji
Vinay Parikh
Sarah Williams
Elisabeth Mocaër
Caryn Trocmé-Thibierge
Martin Sarter
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USServier (France) · FRTemple University · US

Funding

SUBSTANCE ABUSE INTERDISCIPLINARY TRAINING PROGRAMT32DA007267 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI GNEGY, MARGARET E · 1994 to 2015
$4.5M
Nicotinic regulation of cortical ACh release and behavioral functionR01MH080332 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI SARTER, MARTIN F · 2007 to 2010
$1.2M
In vivo screening of cholinergic cognition enhancersR21MH080426 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI SARTER, MARTIN F · 2007 to 2008
$367k
NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA007267NIMH NIH HHS MH080332NIMH NIH HHS MH080426NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH080332NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH080426
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Impairments in attention are a major component of the cognitive symptoms of neuropsychiatric and neurodegenerative disorders. Using an operant sustained attention task (SAT), including a distractor condition (dSAT), we assessed the putative pro-attentional effects of the selective alpha4beta2(*) nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) agonist S 38232 in comparison with the non-selective agonist nicotine. Neither drug benefited SAT performance. However, in interaction with the increased task demands implemented by distractor presentation, the selective agonist, but not nicotine, enhanced the detection of signals during the post-distractor recovery period. This effect is consistent with the hypothesis that second-long increases in cholinergic activity ('transients') mediate the detection of cues and that nAChR agonists augment such transients. Electrochemical recordings of prefrontal cholinergic transients evoked by S 38232 and nicotine indicated that the alpha4beta2(*) nAChR agonist evoked cholinergic transients that were characterized by a faster rise time and more rapid decay than those evoked by nicotine. Blockade of the alpha7 nAChR 'sharpens' nicotine-evoked transients; therefore, we determined the effects of co-administration of nicotine and the alpha7 nAChR antagonist methyllycaconitine on dSAT performance. Compared with vehicle and nicotine alone, this combined treatment significantly enhanced the detection of signals. These results indicate that compared with nicotine, alpha4beta2(*) nAChR agonists significantly enhance attentional performance and that the dSAT represents a useful behavioral screening tool. The combined behavioral and electrochemical evidence supports the hypothesis that nAChR agonist-evoked cholinergic transients, which are characterized by rapid rise time and fast decay, predict robust drug-induced enhancement of attentional performance.

Indexed as

Acetylcholinealpha7 Nicotinic Acetylcholine ReceptorAnimalsAttentionBrainBrain ChemistryCognitionCuesDrug InteractionsElectrochemical TechniquesExcitatory Postsynaptic PotentialsExecutive FunctionMaleNeuropsychological TestsNicotineNicotinic AgonistsAcetylcholinealpha7 Nicotinic Acetylcholine ReceptorChrna7 protein, ratNicotineNicotinic AgonistsNicotinic Antagonistsnicotinic receptor alpha4beta2Receptors, Nicotinic

Identifiers

PMID20147893
PMCPMC2855755
OpenAlexW2085190125

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.