Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20146825›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2010

Using machine learning to speed up manual image annotation: application to a 3D imaging protocol for measuring single cell gene expression in the developing C. elegans embryo.

Zafer Aydin, John I Murray, Robert H Waterston, William S Noble

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Delineating the mechanisms and design principles ofComputational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Zafer AydinDepartment of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA. zafer@u.washington.edu
John I Murray
Robert H Waterston
William S Noble

Funding

ZDS2P REGULATES SWE1P-DEPENDENT POLARIZED CELL GROWTH IN S CEREVISIAEP41RR011823 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI DAVIS, TRACY · 1996 to 2011
$24.7M
Automated single-cell expression analysis in C. elegansR01GM072675 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI WATERSTON, ROBERT H · 2005 to 2017
$7.1M
Dissecting the Regulation of Gene Expression during C. elegans EmbryogenesisK99GM083145 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI MURRAY, JOHN ISAAC · 2008 to 2009
$175k
NCRR NIH HHS RR0011823NIGMS NIH HHS GM072675-04NIGMS NIH HHS K-99 GM083145-02
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImage analysis is an essential component in many biological experiments that study gene expression, cell cycle progression, and protein localization. A protocol for tracking the expression of individual C. elegans genes was developed that collects image samples of a developing embryo by 3-D time lapse microscopy. In this protocol, a program called StarryNite performs the automatic recognition of fluorescently labeled cells and traces their lineage. However, due to the amount of noise present in the data and due to the challenges introduced by increasing number of cells in later stages of development, this program is not error free. In the current version, the error correction (i.e., editing) is performed manually using a graphical interface tool named AceTree, which is specifically developed for this task. For a single experiment, this manual annotation task takes several hours.

resultsIn this paper, we reduce the time required to correct errors made by StarryNite. We target one of the most frequent error types (movements annotated as divisions) and train a support vector machine (SVM) classifier to decide whether a division call made by StarryNite is correct or not. We show, via cross-validation experiments on several benchmark data sets, that the SVM successfully identifies this type of error significantly. A new version of StarryNite that includes the trained SVM classifier is available at http://starrynite.sourceforge.net.

conclusionsWe demonstrate the utility of a machine learning approach to error annotation for StarryNite. In the process, we also provide some general methodologies for developing and validating a classifier with respect to a given pattern recognition task.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceAnimalsCaenorhabditis elegansCaenorhabditis elegans ProteinsEmbryo, NonmammalianGene Expression ProfilingImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedImaging, Three-DimensionalCaenorhabditis elegans Proteins

Identifiers

PMID20146825
PMCPMC2838868

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.