ArticleBMC bioinformatics2010
Using machine learning to speed up manual image annotation: application to a 3D imaging protocol for measuring single cell gene expression in the developing C. elegans embryo.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deep learning-based enhancement of fluorescence labeling for accurate cell lineage tracing during embryogenesis.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
- A full-body transcription factor expression atlas with completely resolved cell identities in C. elegans.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Delineating the mechanisms and design principles ofComputational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022Review
- Combinatorial decoding of the invariant C. elegans embryonic lineage in space and time.Genesis (New York, N.Y. : 2000) · 2016Review
- Visualization and correction of automated segmentation, tracking and lineaging from 5-D stem cell image sequences.BMC bioinformatics · 2014Article
- A semi-local neighborhood-based framework for probabilistic cell lineage tracing.BMC bioinformatics · 2014Article
- A novel cell nuclei segmentation method for 3D C. elegans embryonic time-lapse images.BMC bioinformatics · 2013Article
- A microfluidic device and computational platform for high-throughput live imaging of gene expression.Nature methods · 2012Article
- The early bird catches the worm: new technologies for the Caenorhabditis elegans toolkit.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2011Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundImage analysis is an essential component in many biological experiments that study gene expression, cell cycle progression, and protein localization. A protocol for tracking the expression of individual C. elegans genes was developed that collects image samples of a developing embryo by 3-D time lapse microscopy. In this protocol, a program called StarryNite performs the automatic recognition of fluorescently labeled cells and traces their lineage. However, due to the amount of noise present in the data and due to the challenges introduced by increasing number of cells in later stages of development, this program is not error free. In the current version, the error correction (i.e., editing) is performed manually using a graphical interface tool named AceTree, which is specifically developed for this task. For a single experiment, this manual annotation task takes several hours.
resultsIn this paper, we reduce the time required to correct errors made by StarryNite. We target one of the most frequent error types (movements annotated as divisions) and train a support vector machine (SVM) classifier to decide whether a division call made by StarryNite is correct or not. We show, via cross-validation experiments on several benchmark data sets, that the SVM successfully identifies this type of error significantly. A new version of StarryNite that includes the trained SVM classifier is available at http://starrynite.sourceforge.net.
conclusionsWe demonstrate the utility of a machine learning approach to error annotation for StarryNite. In the process, we also provide some general methodologies for developing and validating a classifier with respect to a given pattern recognition task.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.