Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20146807›Full record

ReviewJournal of hematology & oncology2010

Ovarian cancer immunotherapy: opportunities, progresses and challenges.

Bei Liu, John Nash, Carolyn Runowicz, Helen Swede, Richard Stevens, Zihai Li

Abstract readEvaluation StudyReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of hematology & oncology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. CD4Journal of translational medicine · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The immunopeptidomic landscape of ovarian carcinomas.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Production and Characterization of a Novel Monoclonal Antibody Against Human Sortilin.Monoclonal antibodies in immunodiagnosis and immunotherapy · 2015
    Article
  18. The effect of sortilin silencing on ovarian carcinoma cells.Avicenna journal of medical biotechnology · 2014
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Bei LiuDepartment of Immunology, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, USA. bliu@up.uchc.edu
John Nash
Carolyn Runowicz
Helen Swede
Richard Stevens
Zihai Li

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Due to the low survival rates from invasive ovarian cancer, new effective treatment modalities are urgently needed. Compelling evidence indicates that the immune response against ovarian cancer may play an important role in controlling this disease. We herein summarize multiple immune-based strategies that have been proposed and tested for potential therapeutic benefit against advanced stage ovarian cancer. We will examine the evidence for the premise that an effective therapeutic vaccine against ovarian cancer is useful not only for inducing remission of the disease but also for preventing disease relapse. We will also highlight the questions and challenges in the development of ovarian cancer vaccines, and critically discuss the limitations of some of the existing immunotherapeutic strategies. Finally, we will summarize our own experience on the use of patient-specific tumor-derived heat shock protein-peptide complex for the treatment of advanced ovarian cancer.

Indexed as

Cancer VaccinesCarcinomaFemaleHumansImmunologic SurveillanceImmunotherapyLymphocytes, Tumor-InfiltratingOvarian NeoplasmsPrognosisTreatment OutcomeCancer Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID20146807
PMCPMC2831814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.